Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 65.1 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want an MIT-licensed multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 75 against 46
- Documentation and upkeep, 58 against 36
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 328.4 GB in FP8, and no Ollama or LM Studio local build exists
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 60
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3-Flash | Laguna M.1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 75 | 46 | GLM-5.3-Flash +29 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 65 | Laguna M.1 +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Laguna M.1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 36 | GLM-5.3-Flash +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 65.1/100 | C 55.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai | Poolside |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-07-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3-Flash
An MIT-licensed multimodal agent and coding model with a 1M-token context and several tool calls per turn, served by vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers. Z.ai's smallest build is 328 GB in FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The main risk is that nothing on safety or prompt injection is published and there is no way to report a flaw.
Laguna M.1
A large coding and agent cousin under plain Apache 2.0, for agents with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine, and no local runtime library packages it. The main risks are no upkeep since July, no hosted fallback shown today, no safety results, and repository code on the SGLang route.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3-Flash
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47(vLLM 0.32.0 or later, about 386 GB of GPU memory per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Don't rely on
thinking: falsefrom SGLang's cookbook, since the template has no such switch and always opens a think block - Set
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the default keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt - On a 128 GB machine only third-party low-bit builds come near fitting, none of them from Z.ai
Laguna M.1
- Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with
vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
- It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3-Flash or Laguna M.1?
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 65.1 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on reach and agent interface.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3-Flash or Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-laguna-m-1.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/laguna-m-1.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3-flash laguna-m-1(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3-flash", "b": "laguna-m-1"}at/mcp, no key