Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 65.1 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-4B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-4B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want an MIT-licensed multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 58 against 48
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 328.4 GB in FP8, and no Ollama or LM Studio local build exists
Best for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 70 against 60
Watch for
The pixel decoder ships as a pickle file
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach WeVisOne-VL-4B +10
GLM-5.3-Flash 60
Memory earns nothing, since Z.ai's smallest build is the 328.4 GB FP8 one, about 394 GB with the fifth added, and neither Ollama nor LM Studio has a local build (both list it as cloud only). Four runtimes run it in a released version, llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, for 20, while Ollama and LM Studio don't. Z.ai publishes one quantised build, FP8, for 10. The MIT licence with nothing added gives the full 15, the files download with no account or gate for 10, and Z.ai's own API plus six providers on Hugging Face serve it, for 5.
WeVisOne-VL-4B 70
Memory 30, the only build from Tencent is the BF16 safetensors file with its decoder, 9.7 GB, and 9.7 GB × 1.2 = 11.6 GB, within 16 GB. No runtime library has a build. Runtimes 15, the architecture is Qwen3VLForConditionalGeneration, which vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 run from the safetensors file, three at 5 each. Builds 0, Tencent publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata with the LICENSE file in the repository, and nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 30 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 70.
Documentation and upkeep GLM-5.3-Flash +10
GLM-5.3-Flash 58
The card covers architecture, parameters and languages and misses four of the seven items, for 8. Training data is 5, a 30T-token corpus described with no sources or cut-off. The last change, a chat template speed-up on 15 October in both repositories, is within 30 days on 2 November, for 20; Z.ai's GLM-5 GitHub repository has changed only its docs since. Responsiveness is 10, as zai-org answered 14 of the 38 recent discussions others opened (26 August to 30 October), the last on 28 September, which is some but not most. Version policy is 5 for a first release, and file health is the full 10, with files and card agreeing and no broken-file report waiting as far as the research record shows.
WeVisOne-VL-4B 48
Model card 8, Intended use, limitations and the architecture are on the card. Training data 5, A general description in the README of a data engine and over 100 million annotated images, with no sources named and no cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 27 October 2026, added links to the paper and project page, 14 days before this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (23 and 26 October 2026) has a reply from a tencent member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release, 14 days old. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the Qwen3-VL classes, and the card names mask_decoder.pt as required and it's there. 8 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 48.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3-Flash | WeVisOne-VL-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 70 | WeVisOne-VL-4B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 48 | GLM-5.3-Flash +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 65.1/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3-Flash | WeVisOne-VL-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai | Tencent (WeChat Vision) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-10-27 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3-Flash
An MIT-licensed multimodal agent and coding model with a 1M-token context and several tool calls per turn, served by vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers. Z.ai's smallest build is 328 GB in FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The main risk is that nothing on safety or prompt injection is published and there is no way to report a flaw.
WeVisOne-VL-4B
A small Apache 2.0 perception model that finds, counts, reads and cuts out what you name in an image, and says None when it isn't there. Boxes and points run in vLLM, SGLang or Transformers. Masks and mattes need Tencent's package and a pickle file. Two weeks old, with no questions answered yet and no safety results.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3-Flash
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47(vLLM 0.32.0 or later, about 386 GB of GPU memory per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Don't rely on
thinking: falsefrom SGLang's cookbook, since the template has no such switch and always opens a think block - Set
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the default keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt - On a 128 GB machine only third-party low-bit builds come near fitting, none of them from Z.ai
WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Use Tencent's package:
WeVisOneVL("tencent/WeVisOne-VL-4B", backend="vllm")thenmodel.predict(image, task=..., query=...) - Tasks are detection, referring, point, count_box, count_point, ocr, ocr_grounding, segmentation and matting
- A None answer means the target isn't in the image. Treat it as a result, not an error
- mask_decoder.pt is a pickle. Load it only from the tencent repository, and check its SHA-256 against the Hub's
- Send one image a turn. Video grids are rejected by the decoder
- The card says it isn't for identifying individuals or for high-impact decisions on its own
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3-Flash or WeVisOne-VL-4B?
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 65.1 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-4B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-4B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3-Flash or WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Arete-27B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Arete-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Cola2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Inkling vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Kronos vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LBS-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-wevisone-vl-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/wevisone-vl-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3-flash wevisone-vl-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3-flash", "b": "wevisone-vl-4b"}at/mcp, no key