Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want Qwen3.8-27B's skills with shorter thinking, for teams under US$1M revenue or research.
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 43 against 36
Watch for
Commercial use above US$1M gross annual revenue needs a separate licence
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna M.1 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 80 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna M.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Laguna M.1 +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 43 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna M.1 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue with a separate Swift Enterprise License above it. Built on Qwen3.8-27B, whose Apache 2.0 still governs the base |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna M.1
A large coding and agent cousin under plain Apache 2.0, for agents with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine, and no local runtime library packages it. The main risks are no upkeep since July, no hosted fallback shown today, no safety results, and repository code on the SGLang route.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and agent work with images in, that fits a 24 GB machine with UkisAI's own 4-bit builds. Commercial use is free only below US$1M revenue. The main risks are that nobody at UkisAI answers its discussions, and that the shorter thinking rests on UkisAI's own benchmarks.
Before you call either
Laguna M.1
- Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with
vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
- It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 18.4 GB with the vision projector - On our reference machine BF16 fits,
vllm serve ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - The template is Qwen3.8-27B's, so
chat_template_kwargswithreasoning_effortlow, medium or xhigh (default) andenable_thinkingfalse work as on the base - UkisAI benchmarked it at temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 0, which is a reasonable starting point
- The MLX 4-bit build needs UkisAI's patched MLX-LM and has no image or video chat
- Check the licence before commercial use, it stops at US$1M gross annual revenue including affiliates
- MTP self-speculative decoding is available with the base's head, flags on the card
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna M.1 or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B?
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Laguna M.1 or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna M.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-m-1.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-m-1 swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-m-1", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key