Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
Nanbeige4.3-33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 55
Watch for
The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 36
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna M.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 55 | Laguna M.1 +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 56 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna M.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Laguna M.1
A large coding and agent cousin under plain Apache 2.0, for agents with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine, and no local runtime library packages it. The main risks are no upkeep since July, no hosted fallback shown today, no safety results, and repository code on the SGLang route.
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Before you call either
Laguna M.1
- Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with
vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
- It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna M.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
Nanbeige4.3-33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Laguna M.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna M.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs Laguna M.1
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs Laguna M.1
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-nanbeige-4-3-33b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-m-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-m-1 nanbeige-4-3-33b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-m-1", "b": "nanbeige-4-3-33b"}at/mcp, no key