Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
Nanbeige4.3-33B and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). occamy-1.0 leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 56
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.3-33B | occamy-1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | occamy-1.0 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 74 | occamy-1.0 +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.3-33B | occamy-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.3-33B or occamy-1.0?
Nanbeige4.3-33B and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). occamy-1.0 leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.3-33B or occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-3-33b-vs-occamy-1-0.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json·/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-3-33b occamy-1-0(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-3-33b", "b": "occamy-1-0"}at/mcp, no key