Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
occamy-1.0 and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 54
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Agent interface, 80 against 70
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | occamy-1.0 | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 80 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 74 | 54 | occamy-1.0 +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | occamy-1.0 | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
occamy-1.0
A Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fine-tuned for long agent work with tools, files and code, under plain Apache 2.0, and Accio's 4-bit builds run in about 23 GB. The main gaps are no safety results, agent guidance or security contact, and every benchmark figure is Accio's own.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.
Before you call either
occamy-1.0
- Serve with
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 and later - BF16 is 70.2 GB, so on a 128 GB machine run it without the card's 8-way tensor parallelism
- Keep the whole assistant message, reasoning and tool calls included, in later turns, as the card says
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5
- With the GGUFs, NFC-normalise input text and read TOKENIZER.md, since the files store qwen2 pre-tokenizer metadata
- The base's MTP layer isn't in this checkpoint, Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-MTP is an experimental separate head
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, occamy-1.0 or SmolLM3-3B?
occamy-1.0 and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with occamy-1.0 or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs occamy-1.0
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs occamy-1.0
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/occamy-1-0.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare occamy-1-0 smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "occamy-1-0", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key