Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 35
- Risk, 65 against 60
- Agent interface, 80 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 46
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach SmolLM3-3B +50
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
SmolLM3-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest 4-bit build Hugging Face publishes is its own ONNX q4f16 at 2.1 GB, about 2.5 GB with the fifth added, and the full BF16 files that the counted runtimes load come to about 7.4 GB, both under 16 GB. Runtimes 20, released Transformers carries the model code, llama.cpp knows the architecture, and vLLM and SGLang run it through their Transformers backends in released versions; Ollama has no library entry and LM Studio's catalogue has none, so those two earn nothing. Builds 10, Hugging Face's ONNX repository has 4-bit builds, one of the checklist's kinds, and int8 builds, which are neither FP8 nor GGUF. They run in ONNX Runtime and Transformers.js rather than the runtimes above. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0, scored by its terms since the repository holds no LICENSE file. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is listed for it on the Hub and none of the provider lists checked carries it.
Documentation and upkeep SmolLM3-3B +28
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
SmolLM3-3B 74
Model card 14, it covers limitations, architecture, parameters, context and languages but has no intended-use section and leaves the June 2025 cut-off to the chat template. Training data 20, the datasets, mixture weights and post-training set are published with sources and sizes. Last change 20, Hugging Face's ONNX build changed its tokenizer config on 28 October 2026, though the main repository hasn't changed since 10 September 2025. Responsiveness 10, staff answered 14 of 36 discussions, none since November 2025. Version policy 5, a first release never replaced, with no dated notes. File health 5, template and tokenizer reports wait with no reply.
Risk SmolLM3-3B +5
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
SmolLM3-3B 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs on load or to build prompts. Provenance 15, the HuggingFaceTB organisation linked from Hugging Face's launch post, with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, only the general cautions in the card's Limitations section. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added and a working licence link. Security programme 5, huggingface.co has a valid security.txt and Transformers has a security policy; whether advisories are handled in public couldn't be checked from our session, so that half is scored as absent.
Agent interface SmolLM3-3B +5
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
SmolLM3-3B 80
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card says how tools are declared, how calls come back and which vLLM parser to use. Trained tool calling 20, the template invites one or more calls per turn, each in its own block. Structured output 0, nothing documents asking the weights for JSON. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request through the kwarg or a system-prompt flag, and the reasoning comes back in think tags. Context 5, trained at 65,536 tokens, with 131,072 only through YaRN.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 85 | SmolLM3-3B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 80 | SmolLM3-3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 74 | SmolLM3-3B +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LongCat-2.5
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no staff reply in its discussions since November 2025.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or SmolLM3-3B?
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key