Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
LBS-27B D
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory that need to find click targets on dense professional screenshots, or read fine detail in large images, and can run a small crop loop and wait for independent results.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; ScreenSpot-Pro, OS-World-G, PerceptionBench and HR-Bench numbers are inclusionAI's own runs
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 80 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 43
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LBS-27B | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | SmolLM3-3B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 80 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 43 | 54 | SmolLM3-3B +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.9/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LBS-27B | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (the card's metadata and licence section; the LICENSE file sits in the GitHub repository inclusionAI/UI-Venus on its LBS branch, not in the Hugging Face repository) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-26 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LBS-27B
A 27B Qwen3.8 fine-tune for GUI grounding that zooms into screenshots over a few turns before naming a point, and inclusionAI says it also helps with fine detail in large images. It needs about 96 GB at BF16 and a client that runs its crop actions. Every result so far is inclusionAI's own, with no safety results or injection guidance.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.
Before you call either
LBS-27B
- Serve with
vllm serve inclusionAI/LBS-27B --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 65536, which is what the card's wrapper script runs; keep the context at 32,768 or more for multi-turn images - Build the system prompt with
build_system_promptfrom the LBS branch'szoomin_grounding_protocol.py, send the screenshot afterimage_path: <name>, and don't passtools; the model answers in plain text - Parse
<action>crop_image(image_path=..., x1=..., y1=..., x2=..., y2=...)</action>, cut the crop yourself and return it with its mapping to the original image; allow at most two crops per turn and three per episode - Read the final answer as
[x.xx,y.yy]on a 0 to 1000 scale of the original image, and use your own executor to click - Pass
reasoning_effortasxhigh,mediumorlowonly, since the template raises an error forhigh, and don't count onthinking_budget, which the template ignores - Don't turn on MTP speculative decoding; the MTP weights aren't in the repository though config.json names one MTP layer
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LBS-27B or SmolLM3-3B?
SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with LBS-27B or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LBS-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LBS-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LBS-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LBS-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs LBS-27B
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LBS-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs LBS-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs LBS-27B
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lbs-27b-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lbs-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lbs-27b smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lbs-27b", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key