Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-4B
Qwen3.5-4B scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LBS-27B leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
LBS-27B D
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory that need to find click targets on dense professional screenshots, or read fine detail in large images, and can run a small crop loop and wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 43 against 34
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; ScreenSpot-Pro, OS-World-G, PerceptionBench and HR-Bench numbers are inclusionAI's own runs
Best for Agents that want a cheap local helper for tool calls, short reasoning and reading images on a laptop or small GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba for this size
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LBS-27B | Qwen3.5-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | Qwen3.5-4B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.5-4B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 43 | 34 | LBS-27B +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.9/100 | C 61.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LBS-27B | Qwen3.5-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (the card's metadata and licence section; the LICENSE file sits in the GitHub repository inclusionAI/UI-Venus on its LBS branch, not in the Hugging Face repository) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-26 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LBS-27B
A 27B Qwen3.8 fine-tune for GUI grounding that zooms into screenshots over a few turns before naming a point, and inclusionAI says it also helps with fine detail in large images. It needs about 96 GB at BF16 and a client that runs its crop actions. Every result so far is inclusionAI's own, with no safety results or injection guidance.
Qwen3.5-4B
A small vision-language cousin for tool calls, light agent steps and image or video reading on almost any machine, with switchable thinking. Ollama's 3.3 GB build or the 9.3 GB BF16 files run in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. The main risks are no safety results, no structured-output guarantee and no answers from Alibaba since March.
Before you call either
LBS-27B
- Serve with
vllm serve inclusionAI/LBS-27B --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 65536, which is what the card's wrapper script runs; keep the context at 32,768 or more for multi-turn images - Build the system prompt with
build_system_promptfrom the LBS branch'szoomin_grounding_protocol.py, send the screenshot afterimage_path: <name>, and don't passtools; the model answers in plain text - Parse
<action>crop_image(image_path=..., x1=..., y1=..., x2=..., y2=...)</action>, cut the crop yourself and return it with its mapping to the original image; allow at most two crops per turn and three per episode - Read the final answer as
[x.xx,y.yy]on a 0 to 1000 scale of the original image, and use your own executor to click - Pass
reasoning_effortasxhigh,mediumorlowonly, since the template raises an error forhigh, and don't count onthinking_budget, which the template ignores - Don't turn on MTP speculative decoding; the MTP weights aren't in the repository though config.json names one MTP layer
Qwen3.5-4B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:4b(Q4_K_M, about 4 GB with context) - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Turn thinking off with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false}in the request body, since it's on by default and/thinkand/nothinkaren't supported - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=0.7, top_p=0.8, top_k=20, presence_penalty=1.5without thinking - Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LBS-27B or Qwen3.5-4B?
Qwen3.5-4B scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LBS-27B leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LBS-27B or Qwen3.5-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LBS-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs LBS-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LBS-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LBS-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling vs LBS-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LBS-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs LBS-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kronos vs LBS-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lbs-27b-vs-qwen3-5-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lbs-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lbs-27b qwen3-5-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lbs-27b", "b": "qwen3-5-4b"}at/mcp, no key