Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Risk, 85 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
Watch for
No reply from OpenAI to any discussion since August 2025, and template reports wait unanswered
LBS-27B D
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory that need to find click targets on dense professional screenshots, or read fine detail in large images, and can run a small crop loop and wait for independent results.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; ScreenSpot-Pro, OS-World-G, PerceptionBench and HR-Bench numbers are inclusionAI's own runs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-20b | LBS-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 55 | gpt-oss-20b +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 85 | 50 | gpt-oss-20b +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 70 | gpt-oss-20b +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 42 | 43 | LBS-27B +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 69.9/100 | D 53.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-20b | LBS-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (the card's metadata and licence section; the LICENSE file sits in the GitHub repository inclusionAI/UI-Venus on its LBS branch, not in the Hugging Face repository) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-10-26 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is a cousin for reasoning, coding and single tool calls with structured output, under plain Apache 2.0. It needs about 17 GB with a working context, and five inference providers serve it. The main risks are that it trails o4-mini at keeping system instructions above user ones, and OpenAI hasn't answered a report since August 2025.
LBS-27B
A 27B Qwen3.8 fine-tune for GUI grounding that zooms into screenshots over a few turns before naming a point, and inclusionAI says it also helps with fine detail in large images. It needs about 96 GB at BF16 and a client that runs its crop actions. Every result so far is inclusionAI's own, with no safety results or injection guidance.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-20b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:20b(the build that fits the reference machine), orvllm serve openai/gpt-oss-20bwith a current vLLM release rather than the card's pinned vllm==0.10.1+gptoss wheel - Use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony; OpenAI says the model doesn't work correctly without it
- Parse tool calls and reasoning with openai-harmony; calls come on the commentary channel ending in
<|call|>, reasoning on the analysis channel - Set effort with
Reasoning: high(or low, medium) in the system message, orreasoning_effortin the template; medium is the default - Ask for JSON by putting a JSON Schema under
# Response Formatsin the developer message - Drop earlier reasoning after a final answer but pass it back after tool calls, and don't show the analysis channel to users
- Expect one tool call per turn; run several in sequence rather than in parallel
LBS-27B
- Serve with
vllm serve inclusionAI/LBS-27B --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 65536, which is what the card's wrapper script runs; keep the context at 32,768 or more for multi-turn images - Build the system prompt with
build_system_promptfrom the LBS branch'szoomin_grounding_protocol.py, send the screenshot afterimage_path: <name>, and don't passtools; the model answers in plain text - Parse
<action>crop_image(image_path=..., x1=..., y1=..., x2=..., y2=...)</action>, cut the crop yourself and return it with its mapping to the original image; allow at most two crops per turn and three per episode - Read the final answer as
[x.xx,y.yy]on a 0 to 1000 scale of the original image, and use your own executor to click - Pass
reasoning_effortasxhigh,mediumorlowonly, since the template raises an error forhigh, and don't count onthinking_budget, which the template ignores - Don't turn on MTP speculative decoding; the MTP weights aren't in the repository though config.json names one MTP layer
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-20b or LBS-27B?
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against LBS-27B's 53.9 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-20b or LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-20b
- BigBang-v1 vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-20b
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LBS-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling vs LBS-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs LBS-27B
- Kronos vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-lbs-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-20b.json·/api/v1/tools/lbs-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-20b lbs-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-20b", "b": "lbs-27b"}at/mcp, no key