Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 85 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No reply from OpenAI to any discussion since August 2025, and template reports wait unanswered
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 42
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-20b | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | gpt-oss-20b +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 85 | 50 | gpt-oss-20b +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 60 | gpt-oss-20b +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 42 | 56 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 69.9/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-20b | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Jackrong |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is a cousin for reasoning, coding and single tool calls with structured output, under plain Apache 2.0. It needs about 17 GB with a working context, and five inference providers serve it. The main risks are that it trails o4-mini at keeping system instructions above user ones, and OpenAI hasn't answered a report since August 2025.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-20b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:20b(the build that fits the reference machine), orvllm serve openai/gpt-oss-20bwith a current vLLM release rather than the card's pinned vllm==0.10.1+gptoss wheel - Use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony; OpenAI says the model doesn't work correctly without it
- Parse tool calls and reasoning with openai-harmony; calls come on the commentary channel ending in
<|call|>, reasoning on the analysis channel - Set effort with
Reasoning: high(or low, medium) in the system message, orreasoning_effortin the template; medium is the default - Ask for JSON by putting a JSON Schema under
# Response Formatsin the developer message - Drop earlier reasoning after a final answer but pass it back after tool calls, and don't show the analysis channel to users
- Expect one tool call per turn; run several in sequence rather than in parallel
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-20b or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-20b or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-20b
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-20b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-20b qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-20b", "b": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2"}at/mcp, no key