Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 60 | GLM-5.3 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 56 | GLM-5.3 +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Jackrong |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json·/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3 qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3", "b": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2"}at/mcp, no key