Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Apodex-1.1-mini's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Apodex-1.1-mini leads on reach, risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Apodex-1.1-mini C

Best for Long-running agent tasks with tools on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, or through Apodex's API, under a plain licence

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 55
  • Risk, 65 against 50
  • Agent interface, 85 against 70

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5

Watch for

No safety results, and agent guidance only from the harness

GLM-5.3 B

Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider

Ahead on

  • Documentation and upkeep, 58 against 38

Watch for

Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runApodex-1.1-miniGLM-5.3Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%258555Apodex-1.1-mini +30
Risk20%206550Apodex-1.1-mini +15
Agent interface10%108570Apodex-1.1-mini +15
Documentation and upkeep10%103858GLM-5.3 +20
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 61/100B 64.6/100

Facts side by side

FactApodex-1.1-miniGLM-5.3
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorApodex AIZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-08-252026-10-14
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3.3/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Apodex-1.1-mini

An agent cousin fine-tuned from Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for long tasks with files, code and tools, with parallel tool calling and about 3B active parameters. It needs 32 GB for Apodex's GGUF, NVFP4 or GPTQ-Int4 builds or about 86 GB in BF16, and Apodex's API serves it too. The main risks are no safety results and no replies from the publisher.

GLM-5.3

A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.

Before you call either

Apodex-1.1-mini

  1. Serve it with vllm serve apodex/Apodex-1.1-mini --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, or the same parsers in SGLang, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed
  2. For llama.cpp, llama-server -hf apodex/Apodex-1.1-mini-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja --reasoning-format deepseek, and the card passes the repository's chat_template.jinja with --chat-template-file
  3. Pass tools through the API's tools parameter rather than in the system prompt, as the card asks
  4. The card recommends temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, repetition_penalty 1.05 and max_tokens up to 32,768
  5. Send your own system prompt, or set identity_mode, since the template otherwise adds an Apodex identity block
  6. The template keeps all earlier reasoning in the context unless preserve_thinking is false, which grows long agent sessions
  7. Thinking is on by default, send chat_template_kwargs with enable_thinking false for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention
  8. The card's Python example has a broken line where it runs the tool (available_toolsname), so fix it to available_tools[name](**args) before running
  9. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented

GLM-5.3

  1. Start it with vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3 (vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe)
  2. Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
  3. Pass chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"} for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max
  4. Pass clear_thinking: true in chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default
  5. Don't send enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
  7. No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Apodex-1.1-mini or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Apodex-1.1-mini's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Apodex-1.1-mini leads on reach, risk and agent interface.

Other comparisons with Apodex-1.1-mini or GLM-5.3

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.