Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 50 (D), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 64 GB of GPU memory that want fast single-user generation from text and images and can accept lower quality than Gemma 4
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 50
Watch for
No quantised build from Google, so the smallest official build needs the 64 GB band
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 80 against 30
- Reach, 55 against 50
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | GLM-5.3 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 30 | 80 | GLM-5.3 +50 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 55 | GLM-5.3 +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 60 | 58 | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50/100 | B 64.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
A fast local generation cousin for low-concurrency work on text, images and video, with optional thinking and Gemma 4's tool format, under Apache 2.0. It needs about 62 GB for Google's BF16 files and runs only in Transformers or SGLang. The main risk is quality, since Google's own figures put it below Gemma 4 26B A4B, and it's labelled experimental.
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Before you call either
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Serve it with
sglang serve --model-path google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it --dllm-algorithm Gemma4Renoise --trust-remote-codeon SGLang v0.5.22 or later, then call /v1/chat/completions - In Transformers, install
transformers>=5.11.0and loadDiffusionGemmaForBlockDiffusionwithdtype="auto"; generation_config.json already holds the recommended sampler - Turn thinking on with
enable_thinking=Truein apply_chat_template or<|think|>at the start of the system prompt, read the reasoning between<|channel>thoughtand<channel|>, and drop it from history before the next turn - Don't rely on temperature, top_p, logit_bias or JSON Schema in SGLang, which ignores or rejects them for this model; validate JSON yourself
- Streaming arrives one 256-token canvas at a time, not token by token
- Put images before text in the prompt, and pick an image token budget of 70 to 1,120 by how much detail the task needs
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 50 (D), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk.
Other comparisons with DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-glm-5-3.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json - From a terminal
anchor compare diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it glm-5-3(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it", "b": "glm-5-3"}at/mcp, no key