Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Cola2 vs GLM-5.3
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Cola2's 33.9 (F), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Cola2 F
Best for Researchers working on latent or diffusion language models who want a checkpoint to study
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No licence stated for the weights
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Reach, 55 against 25
- Risk, 50 against 40
- Agent interface, 70 against 20
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface GLM-5.3 +50
Cola2 20
Chat template 20, A chat template in tokenizer_config.json (4,116 characters), which came with the Qwen3 tokenizer. Tool-calling format 0, none. Trained tool calling 0, not trained for tool calling. Structured output 0, Nothing about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 0, no reasoning mode. Context 0, no context length is stated. 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 20.
GLM-5.3 70
A Jinja chat template sits in the repository, for 20. The tool-calling format is 10, since it is defined only by the template and the glm47 parser is named by vLLM and SGLang rather than by Z.ai. The template takes several calls in one turn, for 20. Structured output is 0, with nothing on the card and JSON documented only for the hosted API. Reasoning control is 10, a per-request budget through reasoning_effort with the reasoning in a think block, though thinking can't be turned off. Context is 10, 1,048,576 tokens native with no rope scaling.
Reach GLM-5.3 +30
Cola2 25
Memory 15, the only build is the F32 safetensors set, 35.07 GB, and 35.07 GB × 1.2 = 42.1 GB, within 64 GB. Loaded as BF16, as the card's example does, it needs about half, but the line reads the file size. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version. Builds 0, one set of weights and no quantised build. Terms 0, no licence for the weights. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and nothing names an API that serves it. 15 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 25.
GLM-5.3 55
Memory earns nothing, since Z.ai's smallest build is the 755.6 GB FP8 one, about 907 GB with the fifth added, and Ollama only lists a cloud entry. Four runtimes run it in a released version, llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, for 20, while Ollama and LM Studio have no local build. Z.ai publishes one quantised build, FP8, for 10, since the BF16 repository is the full precision. The GLM-5.3 License is a custom licence that is free for commercial use below a revenue threshold, for 10. The files download with no account or gate, for 10, and Z.ai's own API plus eight live providers on Hugging Face serve it, for 5.
Risk GLM-5.3 +10
Cola2 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ByteDance-Seed organisation, which the ByteDance-Seed GitHub repository for the model links to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results. Agent guidance 5, General cautions in the GitHub model card: not instruction-tuned or safety-aligned, not for use as an assistant, for facts or advice, or for high-impact decisions about people. Licence risk 0, With no licence for the weights there is nothing to hold ByteDance to. Security programme 5, the GitHub repository's SECURITY.md sends reports to ByteDance's security centre and says how they're assessed (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 0 + 5 = 40.
GLM-5.3 50
File safety is full, with safetensors only, no Python in the repository and no remote code needed in Transformers 5.12.0 or later. Provenance is full, files in the zai-org organisation Z.ai links to with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation is 0, because the blog mentions safety evaluation and hardening but publishes no results, and agent guidance is 0, with nothing on refusals, prompt injection or cautions. Licence risk is 10, losing 5 for the security review that model-as-a-service operators above US$10 billion of revenue must pass. The security programme is 0, with no security.txt, no SECURITY.md and no advisories.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cola2 | GLM-5.3 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 25 | 55 | GLM-5.3 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 50 | GLM-5.3 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 20 | 70 | GLM-5.3 +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 58 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 33.9/100 | B 64.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cola2 | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | ByteDance (Seed) | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | None stated for the weights (the code is Apache 2.0) | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-06 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Cola2
A research release, and an honest one: ByteDance Seed says it's a base model with an unconverged latent stage, scoring below Llama-3-8B on its own table. It's here for people studying continuous-latent generation. Agents can't use it as a model: 32-token completions, no chat or tools, the repository's own code to load it, and no licence on the weights.
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Before you call either
Cola2
- Don't plan to use this as your model. It completes short prompts and wasn't tuned to follow instructions
- Don't use it commercially on the strength of this listing. The weights have no stated licence
- If you study it, read modeling_cola2.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
- Pin Transformers below 5, as the card requires
- Pass a seeded torch.Generator to generate(). Output varies between runs even with greedy decoding
- Check the download with
sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cola2 or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Cola2's 33.9 (F), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Cola2 or GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Cola2
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Cola2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Cola2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Arete-27B vs Cola2
- Arete-27B vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs Cola2
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- Carbon-X vs Cola2
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3
- Cola2 vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Cola2 vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Cola2 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cola2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Cola2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Cola2 vs Devstral Small 2
- Cola2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Cola2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cola2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Cola2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Cola2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Cola2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cola2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Cola2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Cola2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cola2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Cola2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- Cola2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cola2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cola2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Cola2 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Cola2 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Hy3
- Cola2 vs Inkling
- Cola2 vs Inkling-Small
- Cola2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Cola2 vs Kimi K3
- Cola2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Cola2 vs Kolibri-1
- Cola2 vs Kronos
- Cola2 vs Laguna M.1
- Cola2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cola2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cola2 vs LBS-27B
- Cola2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cola2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Cola2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Cola2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Cola2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cola2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cola2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cola2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Cola2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cola2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cola2 vs Mistral Large 4
- Cola2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cola2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Cola2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Cola2 vs occamy-1.0
- Cola2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cola2 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Cola2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Cola2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cola2 vs Recursive Flint
- Cola2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Cola2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Cola2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cola2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cola2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cola2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Cola2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cola2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cola2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cola2-vs-glm-5-3.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cola2.json·/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cola2 glm-5-3(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cola2", "b": "glm-5-3"}at/mcp, no key