Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507's 56.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach, risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 80 against 37
- Documentation and upkeep, 58 against 26
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Best for Agents that want a fast, capable instruct model on one 24 GB GPU or a 32 GB Mac, with a plain licence and long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 80 | 37 | GLM-5.3 +43 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 26 | GLM-5.3 +32 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | C 56.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2025-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
A quick general-purpose cousin, with 3.3B of 30.5B parameters active per token, for instruction following, tool calling and long documents without a thinking step. It needs about 21 to 23 GB at 4 bits, and several providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes in over a year, no answers from Alibaba and no safety results.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3:30b-instruct, 19 GB. Plainqwen3:30bandqwen3:30b-a3bare the Thinking-2507 edition, not this one - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes, 61 GB of weights fits the GPU share - Use the hermes parser in vLLM or qwen25 in SGLang, the template emits JSON inside tool_call tags
- Don't pass enable_thinking, this edition never thinks and the card says the flag isn't needed
- Sampling per the card is temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and min_p 0, with presence_penalty up to 2 against repetition
- Leave config.json as it is unless you need more than 262,144 tokens, the 1M mode swaps in config_1m.json and runs one sequence at a time
- Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507's 56.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach, risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-vs-qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3 qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3", "b": "qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507"}at/mcp, no key