Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Best for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 58
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +35
GLM-5.3 55
Memory earns nothing, since Z.ai's smallest build is the 755.6 GB FP8 one, about 907 GB with the fifth added, and Ollama only lists a cloud entry. Four runtimes run it in a released version, llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, for 20, while Ollama and LM Studio have no local build. Z.ai publishes one quantised build, FP8, for 10, since the BF16 repository is the full precision. The GLM-5.3 License is a custom licence that is free for commercial use below a revenue threshold, for 10. The files download with no account or gate, for 10, and Z.ai's own API plus eight live providers on Hugging Face serve it, for 5.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90
Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGUF, 4-bit safetensors builds and Ollama entry need 32 GB. Runtimes 25, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.18.0 and later, llama.cpp's own MiniCPM-V 4.7 support and OpenBMB's entry on Ollama. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes FP8, three 4-bit safetensors builds and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is mapped. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10
GLM-5.3 58
The card covers intended use, languages and context and misses limitations, architecture, parameters and cut-off, for 8. Training data is 5, a description of the GLM-5 corpus in the cited report with no cut-off. The last change, a chat template speed-up on 14 October in the FP8 repository and on 15 October in the BF16 one, is within 30 days on 2 November, for 20. Responsiveness is 5, as zai-org answered 2 of the 16 discussions that aren't pull requests, the last on 8 September, which is a few, and no discussion has been opened since 10 October. Version policy is the full 10, with each GLM-5 release in its own repository and a dated blog saying what changed from GLM-5.2. File health is the full 10, with files and card agreeing and no broken-file report waiting by title.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68
Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 0, none described. Last change 20, a commit on 3 November 2026. Responsiveness 20, OpenBMB answered 8 of 12 discussions. Version policy 10, earlier versions keep their repositories and the changes are dated and described. File health 10, the files agree. 8 + 0 + 20 + 20 + 10 + 10 = 68.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5
GLM-5.3 50
File safety is full, with safetensors only, no Python in the repository and no remote code needed in Transformers 5.12.0 or later. Provenance is full, files in the zai-org organisation Z.ai links to with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation is 0, because the blog mentions safety evaluation and hardening but publishes no results, and agent guidance is 0, with nothing on refusals, prompt injection or cautions. Licence risk is 10, losing 5 for the security review that model-as-a-service operators above US$10 billion of revenue must pass. The security programme is 0, with no security.txt, no SECURITY.md and no advisories.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed. Provenance 15, the files come from the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub README links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either, and the card has no limitations section. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt or SECURITY.md.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 68 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-11-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
A vision-language cousin for images and video that fits a 24 to 32 GB machine from OpenBMB's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, with a publisher that answers. The card says little about limits, training data or how tool calls come back, so test the tool format in your runtime before relying on it.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:35b-a3b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the 4x projector for more visual detail at a higher cost - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - With Transformers pass
enable_thinkingtoapply_chat_template, and passdownsample_modeto bothapply_chat_templateandgenerate - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser. The template uses the Qwen3.5 function-block format
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs GLM-5.3
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs GLM-5.3
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-5.3
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3 minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3", "b": "minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key