Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's 63.2 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 80 against 58
- Documentation and upkeep, 58 against 36
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Best for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
No safety evaluation, no agent-use guidance and no way to report a security flaw
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 80 | 58 | GLM-5.3 +22 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 36 | GLM-5.3 +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | B 63.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-04-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A fast mixture-of-experts cousin with 3B active parameters for coding and tool calling, with image and video input, in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 28 GB. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba maintains it, with no safety results, no security contact and no replies to tool-calling reports.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run qwen3.6:35b(Q4_K_M, 23 to 24 GB on disk, about 28 GB in memory) - On the reference machine use
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, BF16, since vLLM doesn't document FP8 compute on gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool-call parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser in vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 or later
- Thinking is on by default and /nothink isn't supported, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks, or preserve_thinking as true to keep earlier reasoning
- Card sampling for thinking is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5, and for non-thinking temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8
- Keep at least 128K of context as the card advises, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since the model card documents none
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's 63.2 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3 qwen3-6-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3", "b": "qwen3-6-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key