Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B

GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Nanbeige4.3-33B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

GLM-5.3 B

Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build

Nanbeige4.3-33B C

Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.

Ahead on

  • Risk, 60 against 50
  • Agent interface, 85 against 70

Watch for

No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGLM-5.3Nanbeige4.3-33BEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%255555even
Risk20%205060Nanbeige4.3-33B +10
Agent interface10%107085Nanbeige4.3-33B +15
Documentation and upkeep10%105856GLM-5.3 +2
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 64.6/100C 61/100

Facts side by side

FactGLM-5.3Nanbeige4.3-33B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorZ.ai (Zhipu AI)Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceGLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators)Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-142026-10-24
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)none

Verdicts

GLM-5.3

A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.

Nanbeige4.3-33B

A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.

Before you call either

GLM-5.3

  1. Start it with vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3 (vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe)
  2. Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
  3. Pass chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"} for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max
  4. Pass clear_thinking: true in chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default
  5. Don't send enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
  7. No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe

Nanbeige4.3-33B

  1. Serve with vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers
  2. Keep tool_call_format at its default xml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; the json option writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes
  3. Pass chat_template_kwargs {"preserve_thinking": true} for multi-turn tool use and coding, and {"enable_thinking": false} to skip reasoning, as the card recommends
  4. Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
  5. Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
  6. Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
  7. In plain Transformers pass use_cache=True to generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?

GLM-5.3 scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Nanbeige4.3-33B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and agent interface.

Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or Nanbeige4.3-33B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.