Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
GLM-5.3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 64.6 (B) and 64.2 (B). Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
GLM-5.3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an open coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, or agents that call it through Z.ai or a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 80 against 34
Watch for
Z.ai's smallest build is 755.6 GB in FP8, with no local Ollama or LM Studio build
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B B
Best for Agents on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a fast tool-calling reasoning model with long context and a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Risk, 75 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 58
Watch for
No safety evaluation results published
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-5.3 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 80 | 34 | GLM-5.3 +46 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 75 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 90 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 58 | 70 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | B 64.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-5.3 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | GLM-5.3 License (MIT-style, with a security review for the largest model-as-a-service operators) | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-08-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-5.3
A large coding and long-horizon agent model with a 1M-token context, several tool calls per turn and three reasoning budgets. Z.ai's smallest build is 756 GB in FP8, so it needs an 8-GPU server, Z.ai's API or a provider. The main risks are no published safety work, no way to report a flaw, and thinking that can't be turned off.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
A small agent cousin, 3B active parameters, with trained parallel tool calls, a thinking switch and up to 1M tokens of context, under a permissive licence. It runs in about 23 GB from the GGUF or Ollama builds, and NVIDIA's NVFP4 build needs NVIDIA GPUs. The main risks are no published safety results and one answered question across two repositories.
Before you call either
GLM-5.3
- Start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-5.3 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --speculative-config.method mtp --speculative-config.num_speculative_tokens 5 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm47 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-5.3(vLLM 0.28.0 or later, 8xH200 or 8xH20 per vLLM's recipe) - Use the glm47 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang; SGLang's cookbook says glm45 leaves the calls as plain text
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"reasoning_effort": "low"}for short tasks; anything other than low or high falls back to max - Pass
clear_thinking: truein chat use, since the template keeps earlier reasoning by default - Don't send
enable_thinking: false; the template ignores it and always opens a think block - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output is documented only for Z.ai's hosted API
- No Z.ai build fits a 128 GB machine; the full 1M context needs 8xB200 per vLLM's recipe
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning, about 19 to 25 GB of files depending on the platform - On the reference machine use
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_0 --jinja, since the card's Q4_K_M tag doesn't exist there and NVFP4 needs NVIDIA GPUs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, which vLLM's nemotron_v3 parser reads so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Go past 262,144 tokens only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576) and enough memory
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-5.3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?
GLM-5.3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 64.6 (B) and 64.2 (B). Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-5.3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-5.3
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-5.3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-5-3-vs-nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-5-3.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-5-3 nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-5-3", "b": "nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key