Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 61.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B B
Best for Agents on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a fast tool-calling reasoning model with long context and a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Risk, 75 against 45
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation results published
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server or a 128 GB Mac who want Qwen's newest sparse architecture for agentic coding and multimodal work, and aren't a hosted-model or coding-assistant business.
Ahead on
- Capability, 74 against 34
Watch for
No build fits the reference machine's 107.4 GB, and Ollama's smallest Linux build is 120 GB
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 34 | 74 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +40 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 65 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 45 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 70 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 70 | 36 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.2/100 | C 61.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Qwen Community License 1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence). Free of charge, the model name shown in products above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue, and a separate licence from Qwen before commercial use by a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
A small agent cousin, 3B active parameters, with trained parallel tool calls, a thinking switch and up to 1M tokens of context, under a permissive licence. It runs in about 23 GB from the GGUF or Ollama builds, and NVIDIA's NVFP4 build needs NVIDIA GPUs. The main risks are no published safety results and one answered question across two repositories.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large sparse cousin with 6B active parameters for agentic coding and multimodal work, previewing Qwen's next architecture. It needs a 128 GB Mac for Ollama's MLX build or about 144 GB for the 4-bit GGUF, and Qwen Cloud serves it. The main risk is a licence that needs a separate deal for hosted-model and coding or office assistant businesses.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning, about 19 to 25 GB of files depending on the platform - On the reference machine use
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_0 --jinja, since the card's Q4_K_M tag doesn't exist there and NVFP4 needs NVIDIA GPUs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, which vLLM's nemotron_v3 parser reads so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Go past 262,144 tokens only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576) and enough memory
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a 128 GB Mac start it with
ollama run qwen3.8-flash-next:125b-mlx(105 GB, NVFP4), on Linux the smallest Ollama build isqwen3.8-flash-next:125b-a6b-q4_K_Mat 120 GB, which won't fit a 107.4 GB GPU share - On a server,
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser, as Qwen's GitHub README does
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to skip it, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content, even though SGLang's cookbook says thinking can't be turned off reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Send at most one system message and put it first, since the template raises an error otherwise
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- vLLM keeps the 51B n-gram table in host memory on 80 GB GPUs by default, per its recipe
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Qwen Community License before serving it to others as an API or inside a coding or office assistant product
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 61.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on capability.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b", "b": "qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key