Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-122B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-122B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 36 against 31
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Best for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
No safety evaluation, no agent-use guidance and no way to report a security flaw
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Ornith-1.5-122B +15
Ornith-1.5-122B 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card shows how tools go in and how calls come back and names the parser for vLLM and SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, Ornith trains it on agent tasks and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, Ornith's template reads enable_thinking per request and the card says the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content, though the card doesn't name the switch. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 70
The chat template earns 20 as a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, because the card names the qwen3_coder parser but leaves the return format to the template. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls to a turn in the template. Structured output earns 0, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request with enable_thinking and the reasoning returned in think tags for the qwen3 parser. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens native.
Reach Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10
Ornith-1.5-122B 75
Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, as do its Q4_K_M GGUF, its NVFP4 build and Ollama's build. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35moe architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it. 10 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 85
Memory earns 20 because the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's Q4_K_M at 23 GB, which comes to 27.6 GB with the fifth added, so it needs a 32 GB machine rather than a 24 GB one. Runtimes earn the full 25, since released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the architecture. Builds earn 10 for Alibaba's one quantised build, FP8, with no 4-bit or GGUF from the publisher. Terms earn 15 for plain Apache 2.0, download earns 10 for ungated files, and hosted earns 5 because DeepInfra, Featherless AI and Scaleway serve it through Hugging Face.
Risk Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +5
Ornith-1.5-122B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 55
File safety earns 25 for safetensors only, loaded by the runtimes' own code and a Jinja template with nothing run from the repository. Provenance earns 15, files in the Qwen organisation the publisher links and a hash for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn 0, since the card has neither safety results nor any guidance on refusals, injection or safeguards. Licence risk keeps all 15, as Apache 2.0 carries none of the four conditions and the late LICENSE file only wrote down what the card already said. The security programme earns 0, with no reporting route found on qwen.ai, the card or the GitHub repository, which is noted as unchecked for Alibaba's group-wide centre.
Documentation and upkeep Ornith-1.5-122B +5
Ornith-1.5-122B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, a folder upload to the MLX builds on 24 October 2026, 17 days ago. Responsiveness 0, Ornith answered none of the 5 questions and reports. Version policy 0, the MLX builds were uploaded a second time four days after the first with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, states hardware its own files don't fit and names a variant that doesn't exist, and the two chat templates differ. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 36.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 31
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 5, a README edit on 24 April 2026, 192 days before this check, past 180 days and within a year, and Qwen's GitHub repository holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness earns 0, with no Qwen reply in the 40 most recent of 62 discussions that aren't pull requests, recounted on 2 November. Version policy earns 5, the earlier version kept in its own repository without a note. File health earns 5, the files agree but reports about tool calling and the template wait unanswered.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-122B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Ornith-1.5-122B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 31 | Ornith-1.5-122B +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 62.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-122B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-04-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Ornith-1.5-122B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-122B
The largest Ornith that fits a 128 GB machine, a coding and terminal-agent cousin on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's architecture with XML tool calls and 262,144 tokens of context. Its 4-bit builds need 84 to 93 GB. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies, and a card that misstates the hardware.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A fast mixture-of-experts cousin with 3B active parameters for coding and tool calling, with image and video input, in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 28 GB. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba maintains it, with no safety results, no security contact and no replies to tool-calling reports.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-122B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:122b-q4_K_M, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 262144 - Budget about 92 GB for the Q4_K_M GGUF with a working context, and less context if the machine has under 100 GB for the model
- In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 for general tasks, as the card recommends
- Add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-122B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp, and validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run qwen3.6:35b(Q4_K_M, 23 to 24 GB on disk, about 28 GB in memory) - On the reference machine use
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, BF16, since vLLM doesn't document FP8 compute on gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool-call parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser in vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 or later
- Thinking is on by default and /nothink isn't supported, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks, or preserve_thinking as true to keep earlier reasoning
- Card sampling for thinking is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5, and for non-thinking temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8
- Keep at least 128K of context as the card advises, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since the model card documents none
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-122B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-122B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-122B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-122B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-122b qwen3-6-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-122b", "b": "qwen3-6-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key