Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
Ornith-1.5-122B and Spark-X2.6-4B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Spark-X2.6-4B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 51 against 36
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Ornith-1.5-122B +15
Ornith-1.5-122B 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card shows how tools go in and how calls come back and names the parser for vLLM and SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, Ornith trains it on agent tasks and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, Ornith's template reads enable_thinking per request and the card says the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content, though the card doesn't name the switch. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Spark-X2.6-4B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format lives only in the template and the spark25 parser name only in the SGLang command. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request, a low or high effort is set in the template and the qwen3 parser returns the reasoning apart. Context 10, 1,048,576 tokens with no scaling.
Documentation and upkeep Spark-X2.6-4B +15
Ornith-1.5-122B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, a folder upload to the MLX builds on 24 October 2026, 17 days ago. Responsiveness 0, Ornith answered none of the 5 questions and reports. Version policy 0, the MLX builds were uploaded a second time four days after the first with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, states hardware its own files don't fit and names a variant that doesn't exist, and the two chat templates differ. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 36.
Spark-X2.6-4B 51
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, parameters, context and languages, with no limitations, cut-off or architecture description of its own. Training data 0, the X2.6 card describes none. Last change 20, the card changed on 1 November 2026. Responsiveness 10, SparkLLM members answered 11 of 40 discussions. Version policy 5, X2.5 stays in place with no note. File health 5, the tokenizer config's 131,072 disagrees with the 1M context.
Reach Spark-X2.6-4B +10
Ornith-1.5-122B 75
Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, as do its Q4_K_M GGUF, its NVFP4 build and Ollama's build. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35moe architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it. 10 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Spark-X2.6-4B 85
Memory 30, SparkLLM's Q4_K_M GGUF is 3.19 GB, about 3.8 GB with a fifth added, which fits 8 GB. Runtimes 15 of 25, released llama.cpp, SGLang (to v0.5.23) and Ollama run the spark2_5 architecture X2.6 keeps, while vLLM needs SparkLLM's plugin, Transformers needs the repository's code and LM Studio has no catalogue entry. Builds 15, SparkLLM publishes FP8, INT8, INT4 and GGUF builds. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added, on its own base. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no provider or SparkLLM API serves it.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-122B | Spark-X2.6-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | Spark-X2.6-4B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Ornith-1.5-122B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 51 | Spark-X2.6-4B +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-122B | Spark-X2.6-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Ornith-1.5-122B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-122B
The largest Ornith that fits a 128 GB machine, a coding and terminal-agent cousin on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's architecture with XML tool calls and 262,144 tokens of context. Its 4-bit builds need 84 to 93 GB. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies, and a card that misstates the hardware.
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin card with no training data.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-122B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:122b-q4_K_M, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 262144 - Budget about 92 GB for the Q4_K_M GGUF with a working context, and less context if the machine has under 100 GB for the model
- In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 for general tasks, as the card recommends
- Add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-122B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp, and validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-122B or Spark-X2.6-4B?
Ornith-1.5-122B and Spark-X2.6-4B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Spark-X2.6-4B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-122B or Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Arete-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cola2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-122b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.json·/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-122b spark-x2-6-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-122b", "b": "spark-x2-6-4b"}at/mcp, no key