Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 70
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 51 against 39
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Best for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
About 131 GB to run at 4 bits with images, over a 128 GB machine's share
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Spark-X2.6-4B +15
Spark-X2.6-4B 85
Memory 30, SparkLLM's Q4_K_M GGUF is 3.19 GB, about 3.8 GB with a fifth added, which fits 8 GB. Runtimes 15 of 25, released llama.cpp, SGLang (to v0.5.23) and Ollama run the spark2_5 architecture X2.6 keeps, while vLLM needs SparkLLM's plugin, Transformers needs the repository's code and LM Studio has no catalogue entry. Builds 15, SparkLLM publishes FP8, INT8, INT4 and GGUF builds. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added, on its own base. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no provider or SparkLLM API serves it.
Step 3.7 Flash 70
Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference machine can give a model and within 256 GB. The IQ3 and Q3 builds are below 4 bits and aren't read. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 have the step3p7 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with StepFun's own GGUF. Four at 5 each, and the card documents all four. Builds 15, StepFun publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an FP8 build and an NVFP4 build. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and its licence section, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, StepFun's own API serves it, per the card and our StepFun API listing, and Featherless and DeepInfra are live for it on Hugging Face. 5 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 70.
Agent interface Step 3.7 Flash +15
Spark-X2.6-4B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format lives only in the template and the spark25 parser name only in the SGLang command. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request, a low or high effort is set in the template and the qwen3 parser returns the reasoning apart. Context 10, 1,048,576 tokens with no scaling.
Step 3.7 Flash 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card names the parser to use in two runtimes, step3p5 in vLLM (with auto tool choice) and in SGLang, and both ship Step parsers in a release. Trained tool calling 20, the card presents tool orchestration as a main use, with multi-turn results, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output for the weights. Reasoning control 10, the template has a reasoning_effort setting and keeps reasoning_content, and the card names the step3p5 reasoning parser for vLLM and SGLang, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, and 262,144 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Documentation and upkeep Spark-X2.6-4B +12
Spark-X2.6-4B 51
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, parameters, context and languages, with no limitations, cut-off or architecture description of its own. Training data 0, the X2.6 card describes none. Last change 20, the card changed on 1 November 2026. Responsiveness 10, SparkLLM members answered 11 of 40 discussions. Version policy 5, X2.5 stays in place with no note. File health 5, the tokenizer config's 131,072 disagrees with the 1M context.
Step 3.7 Flash 39
Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the last commit, on 3 June 2026, fixed the modelling code, 160 days before this check and within 180. Responsiveness 0, none of the 11 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (29 May to 24 June 2026) has a reply from a stepfun-ai member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, Step-3.5-Flash stays in its own repositories and 3.7 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the context, and June commits fixed the modelling code. 14 + 0 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 39.
Risk Spark-X2.6-4B +5
Spark-X2.6-4B 50
File safety 15 of 25, safetensors and GGUF only, but the card's Transformers and vLLM routes run the repository's Python. Provenance 15, the files are in SparkLLM's own Hub organisation, which its GitHub docs name, and every file has a checksum, though neither organisation is verified and no company site was found. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, none published. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0 that hasn't changed. Security programme 5 of 10, a private reporting route and email in SparkLLM's community repository, with no public advisories.
Step 3.7 Flash 45
File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the stepfun-ai organisation, which the card's StepFun platform and model page belong to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations section and gives no guidance on prompt injection, instruction priority, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and our StepFun API listing found no security.txt, bug bounty or disclosure policy. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Spark-X2.6-4B | Step 3.7 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 70 | Spark-X2.6-4B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | Spark-X2.6-4B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Step 3.7 Flash +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 51 | 39 | Spark-X2.6-4B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Spark-X2.6-4B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | SparkLLM (XHToken) | StepFun |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-06-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Step 3.7 Flash
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin card with no training data.
Step 3.7 Flash
A capable open agent model with a clean licence, every kind of build and four released runtimes. Two things hold it back: it's a little too big for a 128 GB machine at 4 bits, whatever the card says, and StepFun has gone quiet on the repository since June. No safety results, limitations or data description.
Before you call either
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Step 3.7 Flash
- On a 128 GB machine the 4-bit GGUF won't fit with a working context. Use StepFun's API or a provider, or a server
- On vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser step3p5 --reasoning-parser step3p5 - The card's commands pass trust-remote-code. Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the model built in if you'd rather not run the repository's code
- For llama.cpp load the mmproj file from StepFun's GGUF repository for image input
- StepFun's API has two hosts. Use the one where your key was issued,
api.stepfun.aiorapi.stepfun.com - The same model is on our StepFun API listing, with prices and terms
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Spark-X2.6-4B or Step 3.7 Flash?
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Spark-X2.6-4B or Step 3.7 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Arete-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Arete-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Carbon-X vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Carbon-X vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cola2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cola2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Step 3.7 Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/spark-x2-6-4b-vs-step-3-7-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json·/api/v1/tools/step-3-7-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare spark-x2-6-4b step-3-7-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "spark-x2-6-4b", "b": "step-3-7-flash"}at/mcp, no key