Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Step 3.7 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
About 131 GB to run at 4 bits with images, over a 128 GB machine's share
Best for Small teams and individuals running Qwen3.8-27B for agent or reasoning work who want shorter thinking traces on one 24 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 53 against 39
Watch for
PolyForm Small Business licence, free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Step 3.7 Flash +15
Step 3.7 Flash 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card names the parser to use in two runtimes, step3p5 in vLLM (with auto tool choice) and in SGLang, and both ship Step parsers in a release. Trained tool calling 20, the card presents tool orchestration as a main use, with multi-turn results, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output for the weights. Reasoning control 10, the template has a reasoning_effort setting and keeps reasoning_content, and the card names the step3p5 reasoning parser for vLLM and SGLang, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, and 262,144 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) 70
Chat template 20, the same Jinja template as Qwen3.8-27B, in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the card names the parsers but the format lives only in the template. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn, and BottleCap evaluated agent tasks. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, reasoning_effort budgets thinking per request and the card says where the reasoning comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens.
Documentation and upkeep ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +14
Step 3.7 Flash 39
Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the last commit, on 3 June 2026, fixed the modelling code, 160 days before this check and within 180. Responsiveness 0, none of the 11 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (29 May to 24 June 2026) has a reply from a stepfun-ai member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, Step-3.5-Flash stays in its own repositories and 3.7 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the context, and June commits fixed the modelling code. 14 + 0 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 39.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) 53
Model card 8 of 20, intended use, limitations and parameters are there, but architecture, context, languages and a cut-off aren't. Training data 0, not described. Last change 20, BottleCap's GGUF build of the model changed its card on 7 October 2026, 27 days ago. Responsiveness 10, BottleCap answered 4 of 8 discussions on the main repository. Version policy 5, the earlier ThinkingCap stays in its own repository with an undated pointer to this one. File health 10, the readable metadata and builds agree and no broken-file report waits.
Reach ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +5
Step 3.7 Flash 70
Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference machine can give a model and within 256 GB. The IQ3 and Q3 builds are below 4 bits and aren't read. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 have the step3p7 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with StepFun's own GGUF. Four at 5 each, and the card documents all four. Builds 15, StepFun publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an FP8 build and an NVFP4 build. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and its licence section, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, StepFun's own API serves it, per the card and our StepFun API listing, and Featherless and DeepInfra are live for it on Hugging Face. 5 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 70.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) 75
Memory 25 of 30, BottleCap's IQ4_XS GGUF is 15.5 GB, 18.6 GB with a fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes 20, it keeps the base's qwen3_5 architecture, which llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers run in released versions, while Ollama's entry is the base's. Builds 15, FP8, NVFP4, MLX and GGUF from BottleCap. Terms 10, PolyForm Small Business is free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue. Download 5, the main repository is gated behind a click-through with an account and contact details, though the GGUF, NVFP4 and MLX builds aren't. Hosted 0, no API or inference provider serves it.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Step 3.7 Flash | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 75 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 45 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Step 3.7 Flash +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 39 | 53 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.8/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Step 3.7 Flash | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | StepFun | BottleCap AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) | PolyForm-Small-Business-1.0.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-03 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-01-21 |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Step 3.7 Flash
A capable open agent model with a clean licence, every kind of build and four released runtimes. Two things hold it back: it's a little too big for a 128 GB machine at 4 bits, whatever the card says, and StepFun has gone quiet on the repository since June. No safety results, limitations or data description.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
A Qwen3.8-27B with shorter reasoning, for agent work where thinking tokens cost time, and BottleCap's 4-bit GGUF runs in about 19 GB. The main limits are the licence, which needs a paid licence above 100 people or 1,000,000 USD revenue, a gated main repository, and no safety results or training-data description.
Before you call either
Step 3.7 Flash
- On a 128 GB machine the 4-bit GGUF won't fit with a working context. Use StepFun's API or a provider, or a server
- On vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser step3p5 --reasoning-parser step3p5 - The card's commands pass trust-remote-code. Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the model built in if you'd rather not run the repository's code
- For llama.cpp load the mmproj file from StepFun's GGUF repository for image input
- StepFun's API has two hosts. Use the one where your key was issued,
api.stepfun.aiorapi.stepfun.com - The same model is on our StepFun API listing, with prices and terms
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Check the licence first, an organisation with 100 or more people or 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue needs a commercial licence from BottleCap
- For files without the gate use
llama-server -hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17.4 GB - On vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml, and on SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Set
reasoning_effort(xhigh, medium or low) in chat_template_kwargs, any other value makes the template raise an error - Keep the base's sampling (temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the GGUF card says greedy decoding can loop
- The GGUFs carry an MTP head, and llama.cpp builds without MTP support for this architecture may refuse to load them with a missing blk.64 tensor
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Step 3.7 Flash or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)?
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Step 3.7 Flash or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Arete-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Arete-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- BigBang-v1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Carbon-X vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Carbon-X vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cola2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cola2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Devstral Small 2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kolibri-1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kronos vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kronos vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Mistral Large 4 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Mistral Large 4 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Step 3.7 Flash
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Recursive Flint vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/step-3-7-flash-vs-thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/step-3-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare step-3-7-flash thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "step-3-7-flash", "b": "thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key