Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-20b vs Step 3.7 Flash
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 70
- Risk, 85 against 45
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
Watch for
No reply from OpenAI to any discussion since August 2025, and template reports wait unanswered
Best for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
About 131 GB to run at 4 bits with images, over a 128 GB machine's share
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk gpt-oss-20b +40
gpt-oss-20b 85
File safety earns 25, since the weights are safetensors and metal/model.bin is OpenAI's own raw Metal format rather than pickle, and nothing in the repository runs as code (a judgement call on the .bin name). Provenance earns 15, files in OpenAI's own organisation and a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation earns 10, because the published safety results for this size are OpenAI's own, and the outside review covered gpt-oss-120b. Agent guidance earns 15 for an instruction hierarchy the model was trained to follow, with prompt-injection results, though OpenAI reports it trails o4-mini there. Licence risk keeps 15, with nothing to deduct under Apache 2.0. The security programme earns 5 for OpenAI's security.txt with a Bugcrowd contact. Public advisories for the gpt-oss code couldn't be checked, so that half scores as absent.
Step 3.7 Flash 45
File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the stepfun-ai organisation, which the card's StepFun platform and model page belong to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations section and gives no guidance on prompt injection, instruction priority, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and our StepFun API listing found no security.txt, bug bounty or disclosure policy. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
Reach gpt-oss-20b +20
gpt-oss-20b 90
Memory earns 25, since OpenAI's own MXFP4 build is 13.76 GB and a fifth on top is 16.5 GB, just past the 16 GB band, and Ollama's 14 GB build lands in the same 24 GB band. Runtimes earn the full 25 from model code in released Transformers, vLLM and SGLang, the architecture in llama.cpp and the model in Ollama's library. Builds earn 10, because OpenAI ships one quantised precision, MXFP4, and the original and metal folders are the same weights for its reference code. Terms earn 15 for Apache 2.0, whose usage policy only asks users to follow the law. Download earns 10, since the repository isn't gated. Hosted earns 5, with five inference providers live for it on its Hugging Face page on 1 November 2026, while OpenAI's own API lists it with no usable rate limit and isn't counted.
Step 3.7 Flash 70
Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference machine can give a model and within 256 GB. The IQ3 and Q3 builds are below 4 bits and aren't read. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 have the step3p7 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with StepFun's own GGUF. Four at 5 each, and the card documents all four. Builds 15, StepFun publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an FP8 build and an NVFP4 build. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and its licence section, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, StepFun's own API serves it, per the card and our StepFun API listing, and Featherless and DeepInfra are live for it on Hugging Face. 5 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 70.
Agent interface gpt-oss-20b +5
gpt-oss-20b 90
The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, since OpenAI's harmony guide says how functions are declared and how calls come back, and OpenAI ships the openai-harmony parser. Trained tool calling earns 10, because each call ends the message and waits for its result, so it makes one call at a time. Structured output earns 15 for a JSON Schema given in the developer message, documented in the harmony guide. Reasoning control earns 10, with low, medium or high effort per request and the reasoning on its own channel, though it can't be switched off. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens, which OpenAI describes as trained in even though the config reaches it with YaRN.
Step 3.7 Flash 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card names the parser to use in two runtimes, step3p5 in vLLM (with auto tool choice) and in SGLang, and both ship Step parsers in a release. Trained tool calling 20, the card presents tool orchestration as a main use, with multi-turn results, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output for the weights. Reasoning control 10, the template has a reasoning_effort setting and keeps reasoning_content, and the card names the step3p5 reasoning parser for vLLM and SGLang, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, and 262,144 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-20b | Step 3.7 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 70 | gpt-oss-20b +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 85 | 45 | gpt-oss-20b +40 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 85 | gpt-oss-20b +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 42 | 39 | gpt-oss-20b +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 69.9/100 | C 59.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-20b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | StepFun |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-06-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is a cousin for reasoning, coding and single tool calls with structured output, under plain Apache 2.0. It needs about 17 GB with a working context, and five inference providers serve it. The main risks are that it trails o4-mini at keeping system instructions above user ones, and OpenAI hasn't answered a report since August 2025.
Step 3.7 Flash
A capable open agent model with a clean licence, every kind of build and four released runtimes. Two things hold it back: it's a little too big for a 128 GB machine at 4 bits, whatever the card says, and StepFun has gone quiet on the repository since June. No safety results, limitations or data description.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-20b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:20b(the build that fits the reference machine), orvllm serve openai/gpt-oss-20bwith a current vLLM release rather than the card's pinned vllm==0.10.1+gptoss wheel - Use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony; OpenAI says the model doesn't work correctly without it
- Parse tool calls and reasoning with openai-harmony; calls come on the commentary channel ending in
<|call|>, reasoning on the analysis channel - Set effort with
Reasoning: high(or low, medium) in the system message, orreasoning_effortin the template; medium is the default - Ask for JSON by putting a JSON Schema under
# Response Formatsin the developer message - Drop earlier reasoning after a final answer but pass it back after tool calls, and don't show the analysis channel to users
- Expect one tool call per turn; run several in sequence rather than in parallel
Step 3.7 Flash
- On a 128 GB machine the 4-bit GGUF won't fit with a working context. Use StepFun's API or a provider, or a server
- On vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser step3p5 --reasoning-parser step3p5 - The card's commands pass trust-remote-code. Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the model built in if you'd rather not run the repository's code
- For llama.cpp load the mmproj file from StepFun's GGUF repository for image input
- StepFun's API has two hosts. Use the one where your key was issued,
api.stepfun.aiorapi.stepfun.com - The same model is on our StepFun API listing, with prices and terms
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-20b or Step 3.7 Flash?
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-20b or Step 3.7 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Arete-27B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Arete-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-20b
- BigBang-v1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-20b
- Carbon-X vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cola2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cola2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- Devstral Small 2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-20b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs North Mini Code 1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling vs Step 3.7 Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kronos vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LBS-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Mistral Large 4 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Recursive Flint vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-step-3-7-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-20b.json·/api/v1/tools/step-3-7-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-20b step-3-7-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-20b", "b": "step-3-7-flash"}at/mcp, no key