Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
ZAYA1-8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
About 131 GB to run at 4 bits with images, over a 128 GB machine's share
ZAYA1-8B C
Best for People who want a small, fast reasoning model for maths and code and can live without tool calling
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 70
- Risk, 55 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 50 against 39
Watch for
Tool calling needs a parser that only Zyphra's vLLM fork has
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Step 3.7 Flash +25
Step 3.7 Flash 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card names the parser to use in two runtimes, step3p5 in vLLM (with auto tool choice) and in SGLang, and both ship Step parsers in a release. Trained tool calling 20, the card presents tool orchestration as a main use, with multi-turn results, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output for the weights. Reasoning control 10, the template has a reasoning_effort setting and keeps reasoning_content, and the card names the step3p5 reasoning parser for vLLM and SGLang, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, and 262,144 positions in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
ZAYA1-8B 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (10,700 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template and a fork say it. Trained tool calling 10, the template takes tools and renders calls, and the card recommends settings for agent use, but it doesn't say the model was trained for tool calling or for several calls in a turn, so the lower band. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch, and the card names the qwen3 reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 positions in config.json, for an architecture Zyphra trained end to end, so the config is the model's own. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep ZAYA1-8B +11
Step 3.7 Flash 39
Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the last commit, on 3 June 2026, fixed the modelling code, 160 days before this check and within 180. Responsiveness 0, none of the 11 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (29 May to 24 June 2026) has a reply from a stepfun-ai member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, Step-3.5-Flash stays in its own repositories and 3.7 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the context, and June commits fixed the modelling code. 14 + 0 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 39.
ZAYA1-8B 50
Model card 5, Intended use and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 26 June 2026 (the checkpoint reshaped for Transformers), 137 days before this check, and the quantised repositories on 2 July, 131 days. Responsiveness 20, Of the 16 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 May to 14 August 2026), 10 have a reply from a Zyphra member, which is most. Version policy 5, the original checkpoint is kept as ZAYA1-8B-legacy and the card says so at the top, without a date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture after the reshape. 5 + 0 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Reach ZAYA1-8B +10
Step 3.7 Flash 70
Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference machine can give a model and within 256 GB. The IQ3 and Q3 builds are below 4 bits and aren't read. Runtimes 20, Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 have the step3p7 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with StepFun's own GGUF. Four at 5 each, and the card documents all four. Builds 15, StepFun publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an FP8 build and an NVFP4 build. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and its licence section, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, StepFun's own API serves it, per the card and our StepFun API listing, and Featherless and DeepInfra are live for it on Hugging Face. 5 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 70.
ZAYA1-8B 80
Memory 30, the smallest build from Zyphra is the MXFP4-Experts repository, 5.85 GB, and 5.85 GB × 1.2 = 7.0 GB, within 16 GB. Runtimes 10, Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the zaya model and SGLang 0.5.23 has srt/models/zaya.py. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Zyphra at two precisions, FP8 and MXFP4 for the experts, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API. Zyphra's site lists a cloud product for its open models, which wasn't checked for this model. 30 + 10 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.
Risk ZAYA1-8B +10
Step 3.7 Flash 45
File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the stepfun-ai organisation, which the card's StepFun platform and model page belong to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations section and gives no guidance on prompt injection, instruction priority, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and our StepFun API listing found no security.txt, bug bounty or disclosure policy. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
ZAYA1-8B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the Zyphra organisation, which the card ties to zyphra.com's blog post for the model (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and www.zyphra.com has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Step 3.7 Flash | ZAYA1-8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 80 | ZAYA1-8B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 55 | ZAYA1-8B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Step 3.7 Flash +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 39 | 50 | ZAYA1-8B +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.8/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Step 3.7 Flash | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | StepFun | Zyphra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-03 | 2026-07-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
Step 3.7 Flash
A capable open agent model with a clean licence, every kind of build and four released runtimes. Two things hold it back: it's a little too big for a 128 GB machine at 4 bits, whatever the card says, and StepFun has gone quiet on the repository since June. No safety results, limitations or data description.
ZAYA1-8B
A small reasoning model trained from scratch by one lab, with a clean licence, 4-bit and FP8 builds and a team that answers questions. It's the hardest of the small models to run: its own architecture, a card that points at forks, and tool calling that needs a parser no release has. Little on limits, data or safety.
Before you call either
Step 3.7 Flash
- On a 128 GB machine the 4-bit GGUF won't fit with a working context. Use StepFun's API or a provider, or a server
- On vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser step3p5 --reasoning-parser step3p5 - The card's commands pass trust-remote-code. Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the model built in if you'd rather not run the repository's code
- For llama.cpp load the mmproj file from StepFun's GGUF repository for image input
- StepFun's API has two hosts. Use the one where your key was issued,
api.stepfun.aiorapi.stepfun.com - The same model is on our StepFun API listing, with prices and terms
ZAYA1-8B
- Use it for reasoning, maths and code. Don't count on tool calling outside Zyphra's vLLM fork
- Run it with Transformers 5.22.2 or SGLang 0.5.23, which have the model built in
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 in general, and temperature 0.6 for agent and code work
- Download
Zyphra/ZAYA1-8B, not the legacy repository, for the released runtimes - The quantised repositories have no licence tag. The main one is Apache 2.0
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Step 3.7 Flash or ZAYA1-8B?
ZAYA1-8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Step 3.7 Flash or ZAYA1-8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ZAYA1-8B
- Arete-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Arete-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- BigBang-v1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Carbon-X vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Carbon-X vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cola2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Step 3.7 Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling vs ZAYA1-8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kronos vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kronos vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LBS-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LBS-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Mistral Large 4 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Step 3.7 Flash
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ZAYA1-8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Step 3.7 Flash
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Recursive Flint vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Recursive Flint vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/step-3-7-flash-vs-zaya1-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/step-3-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/zaya1-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare step-3-7-flash zaya1-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "step-3-7-flash", "b": "zaya1-8b"}at/mcp, no key