Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kimi K3 vs ZAYA1-8B
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against ZAYA1-8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. ZAYA1-8B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Kimi K3 B
Best for Teams with a multi-node GPU cluster who want an open 1M-context agent model for long coding and research work
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Agent interface, 65 against 60
Watch for
1,561 GB of files at its smallest publisher build, far beyond any single machine
ZAYA1-8B C
Best for People who want a small, fast reasoning model for maths and code and can live without tool calling
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 50 against 41
Watch for
Tool calling needs a parser that only Zyphra's vLLM fork has
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach ZAYA1-8B +30
Kimi K3 50
Memory earns nothing, because the only build of 4-bit precision or better from Moonshot or a runtime's own library is Moonshot's MXFP4 release of 1,561 GB, about 1,873 GB with the fifth added, far above 256 GB. Ollama and LM Studio list it only as a cloud model. Runtimes earn 15, for model code in released vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp; Transformers has no kimi_k3 code of its own and loads Moonshot's remote code, so it doesn't count. Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision, the MXFP4 files the model was trained for. Terms earn 10, a custom MIT-based licence that is free for commercial use below a revenue threshold. Download earns 10, with no gate and no account. Hosted earns 5, since Moonshot's API serves it and five inference providers are live for it on Hugging Face.
ZAYA1-8B 80
Memory 30, the smallest build from Zyphra is the MXFP4-Experts repository, 5.85 GB, and 5.85 GB × 1.2 = 7.0 GB, within 16 GB. Runtimes 10, Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the zaya model and SGLang 0.5.23 has srt/models/zaya.py. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Zyphra at two precisions, FP8 and MXFP4 for the experts, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API. Zyphra's site lists a cloud product for its open models, which wasn't checked for this model. 30 + 10 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.
Risk Kimi K3 +10
Kimi K3 65
File safety earns 15, safetensors only with no pickle files, less 10 because the documented loading path runs Moonshot's Python with trust_remote_code and builds prompts with encoding_k3.py. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation Moonshot links to with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation earns 20 for the cyber assessment the UK AI Security Institute and CAISI ran and published, which found its safeguards didn't stop exploit development. Agent guidance earns 5 for the blog's general cautions about proactiveness and passing back thinking. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the model-as-a-service revenue threshold and nothing else. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy, SECURITY.md or public advisories found.
ZAYA1-8B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the Zyphra organisation, which the card ties to zyphra.com's blog post for the model (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and www.zyphra.com has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Documentation and upkeep ZAYA1-8B +9
Kimi K3 41
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context, but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 15, an encoding_k3.py update on 20 August, 74 days before 2 November and within 90; the GitHub repository's last commit is 6 August. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no Moonshot reply in the 40 most recent discussions. Version policy earns 5 for a first release. File health earns 5, because a report that the tokeniser goes past the declared vocabulary waits without a reply.
ZAYA1-8B 50
Model card 5, Intended use and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 26 June 2026 (the checkpoint reshaped for Transformers), 137 days before this check, and the quantised repositories on 2 July, 131 days. Responsiveness 20, Of the 16 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 May to 14 August 2026), 10 have a reply from a Zyphra member, which is most. Version policy 5, the original checkpoint is kept as ZAYA1-8B-legacy and the card says so at the top, without a date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture after the reshape. 5 + 0 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Agent interface Kimi K3 +5
Kimi K3 65
The chat template earns 10, because there is no Jinja template and the prompt format exists only as encoding_k3.py, code you run. The tool-calling format earns 10, since Moonshot documents the tools channel but the parser name comes only from vLLM's and SGLang's own recipes. Trained tool calling earns 20 for indexed parallel calls in one turn. Structured output earns 5, as the card names it among its linked guides without saying how to ask the weights for it, and the how sits in hosted-API docs. Reasoning control earns 10, with per-request effort documented on the card and reasoning returned as reasoning_content. Context earns 10 for 1,048,576 tokens trained in.
ZAYA1-8B 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (10,700 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template and a fork say it. Trained tool calling 10, the template takes tools and renders calls, and the card recommends settings for agent use, but it doesn't say the model was trained for tool calling or for several calls in a turn, so the lower band. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch, and the card names the qwen3 reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 positions in config.json, for an architecture Zyphra trained end to end, so the config is the model's own. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi K3 | ZAYA1-8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 80 | ZAYA1-8B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 55 | Kimi K3 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 60 | Kimi K3 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 50 | ZAYA1-8B +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.4/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi K3 | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Zyphra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Kimi K3 License (modified MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-07-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is a 2.8T multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, parallel tool calls and per-request effort, for long coding and research sessions. Its 1,561 GB of files need a multi-node GPU cluster, so most agents will call a hosted copy. The main risks are Moonshot's Python running at load and prompt time, and no answers in its repository.
ZAYA1-8B
A small reasoning model trained from scratch by one lab, with a clean licence, 4-bit and FP8 builds and a team that answers questions. It's the hardest of the small models to run: its own architecture, a card that points at forks, and tool calling that needs a parser no release has. Little on limits, data or safety.
Before you call either
Kimi K3
- Start it with SGLang on a node of 8 B300s, sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path moonshotai/Kimi-K3 --tp-size 8 --context-length 65536 --mem-fraction-static 0.82 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 --tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --port 30000
- Use the kimi_k3 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, and validate tool-call arguments against the schema, since vLLM's recipe says K3 sometimes emits a format its parser doesn't expect
- Pass the whole assistant message back every turn, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, or output becomes unstable
- Thinking is always on; set reasoning_effort to low or high when max is too slow
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic ones
- Don't hand an ongoing session from another model to K3, and state boundaries in the system prompt, since Moonshot warns it can act on its own when intent is unclear
- Without the hardware, call it through Moonshot's API or an inference provider listed on its Hugging Face page
ZAYA1-8B
- Use it for reasoning, maths and code. Don't count on tool calling outside Zyphra's vLLM fork
- Run it with Transformers 5.22.2 or SGLang 0.5.23, which have the model built in
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 in general, and temperature 0.6 for agent and code work
- Download
Zyphra/ZAYA1-8B, not the legacy repository, for the released runtimes - The quantised repositories have no licence tag. The main one is Apache 2.0
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi K3 or ZAYA1-8B?
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against ZAYA1-8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. ZAYA1-8B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Kimi K3 or ZAYA1-8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ZAYA1-8B
- Arete-27B vs Kimi K3
- Arete-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3
- BigBang-v1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3
- Carbon-X vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cola2 vs Kimi K3
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Kimi K3
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs ZAYA1-8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs Kronos
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kronos vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LBS-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ZAYA1-8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Recursive Flint vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-k3-vs-zaya1-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3.json·/api/v1/tools/zaya1-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-k3 zaya1-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-k3", "b": "zaya1-8b"}at/mcp, no key