Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Carbon-X vs ZAYA1-8B
Carbon-X and ZAYA1-8B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). ZAYA1-8B leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Carbon-X C
Best for Agents that need a second opinion on DNA variants and regulatory regions on a 16 to 24 GB machine, without sending sequences to a hosted model.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 80
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 50
Watch for
Not clinically validated and no wet-lab validation reported
ZAYA1-8B C
Best for People who want a small, fast reasoning model for maths and code and can live without tool calling
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 60 against 35
Watch for
Tool calling needs a parser that only Zyphra's vLLM fork has
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface ZAYA1-8B +25
Carbon-X 35
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, only the inherited template shows the format and no parser is named. Trained tool calling 0, nothing says it was trained to call tools. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, thinking can be switched off but was never trained, and the card asks you to keep it off. Context 5, 40,960 tokens from the base, though Hugging Face trained at 8,192 and under 16K. Most of what the card documents for agents is Carbon-X as a tool another model calls, which this checklist doesn't read.
ZAYA1-8B 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (10,700 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template and a fork say it. Trained tool calling 10, the template takes tools and renders calls, and the card recommends settings for agent use, but it doesn't say the model was trained for tool calling or for several calls in a turn, so the lower band. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch, and the card names the qwen3 reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 positions in config.json, for an architecture Zyphra trained end to end, so the config is the model's own. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep Carbon-X +22
Carbon-X 72
Model card 17, everything but a knowledge cut-off. Training data 15, the mid-training sources and shares are listed, the instruction and fine-tuning data aren't named, and there's no cut-off. Last change 20, 28 October 2026, when config.json, generation_config.json, tokenizer_config.json and tokenizer.py were fixed. Responsiveness 10, organisation members replied to 2 of the 4 questions so far. Version policy 5, a first release whose history was squashed without a note. File health 5, the card now sends llama.cpp users to the publisher's GGUF repository, but the tokenizer config's 131,072 still contradicts the card's 40,960. 17 + 15 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 5 = 72.
ZAYA1-8B 50
Model card 5, Intended use and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 26 June 2026 (the checkpoint reshaped for Transformers), 137 days before this check, and the quantised repositories on 2 July, 131 days. Responsiveness 20, Of the 16 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 May to 14 August 2026), 10 have a reply from a Zyphra member, which is most. Version policy 5, the original checkpoint is kept as ZAYA1-8B-legacy and the card says so at the top, without a date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture after the reshape. 5 + 0 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Reach Carbon-X +10
Carbon-X 90
Memory 30, the publisher's Q4_K_M GGUF is 9.6 GB, or 11.6 GB with a fifth added. Runtimes 20, released llama.cpp (from b11742, which added the DNA tokenizer), vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run it, with no Ollama or LM Studio entry. Builds 15, Hugging Face publishes GGUFs at four precisions. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 on the model and on its Qwen3-14B base. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider or Hugging Face API serves it.
ZAYA1-8B 80
Memory 30, the smallest build from Zyphra is the MXFP4-Experts repository, 5.85 GB, and 5.85 GB × 1.2 = 7.0 GB, within 16 GB. Runtimes 10, Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the zaya model and SGLang 0.5.23 has srt/models/zaya.py. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Zyphra at two precisions, FP8 and MXFP4 for the experts, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API. Zyphra's site lists a cloud product for its open models, which wasn't checked for this model. 30 + 10 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.
Risk Carbon-X +10
Carbon-X 65
File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, but the documented loading path runs the repository's tokenizer.py through trust_remote_code. Provenance 15, the files are in HuggingFaceBio, which Hugging Face's GitHub repository links, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Hugging Face reports its own dual-use check on sequence editing in the launch post, without numbers or a harness. Agent guidance 5, general cautions only. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 5, Hugging Face's security.txt is a reporting route, and public advisories couldn't be checked.
ZAYA1-8B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the Zyphra organisation, which the card ties to zyphra.com's blog post for the model (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and www.zyphra.com has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Carbon-X | ZAYA1-8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 80 | Carbon-X +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 55 | Carbon-X +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 35 | 60 | ZAYA1-8B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 72 | 50 | Carbon-X +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Carbon-X | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Hugging Face (HuggingFaceBio) | Zyphra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-07-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
ZAYA1-8B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Carbon-X
A DNA specialist cousin that another agent calls for variant-effect and sequence questions, with DNA kept on the machine. Hugging Face's Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 12 GB and Q8_0 about 19 GB, on llama.cpp b11742 or later. It isn't clinically validated, isn't trained for tool calls or reasoning, and its Python tokenizer runs repository code.
ZAYA1-8B
A small reasoning model trained from scratch by one lab, with a clean licence, 4-bit and FP8 builds and a team that answers questions. It's the hardest of the small models to run: its own architecture, a card that points at forks, and tool calling that needs a parser no release has. Little on limits, data or safety.
Before you call either
Carbon-X
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf HuggingFaceBio/Carbon-X-GGUF:Q8_0 -ngl 99 -c 40960 --jinja --chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": false}' --temp 0.6 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, on llama.cpp b11742 or later - With vLLM or Transformers pass trust_remote_code, and expect the tokenizer to fetch Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Base at a pinned revision on first load
- Keep enable_thinking false and the card's sampling (temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the settings every reported result used
- Keep DNA in files and pass sequences by name, compute positions and base changes in code and send them as context, the card says the model miscounts long sequences
- Only A, C, G and T form 6-mers, so filter N and other IUPAC codes first or they become a single oov token
- Strip the dna tags from answers if you need bare sequence, llama.cpp keeps them in the text
- Cap max_tokens for next-base questions, long DNA generation is slow and degrades
ZAYA1-8B
- Use it for reasoning, maths and code. Don't count on tool calling outside Zyphra's vLLM fork
- Run it with Transformers 5.22.2 or SGLang 0.5.23, which have the model built in
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 in general, and temperature 0.6 for agent and code work
- Download
Zyphra/ZAYA1-8B, not the legacy repository, for the released runtimes - The quantised repositories have no licence tag. The main one is Apache 2.0
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Carbon-X or ZAYA1-8B?
Carbon-X and ZAYA1-8B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). ZAYA1-8B leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Carbon-X or ZAYA1-8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Carbon-X
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Carbon-X
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Carbon-X
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ZAYA1-8B
- Arete-27B vs Carbon-X
- Arete-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- BigBang-v1 vs Carbon-X
- BigBang-v1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Carbon-X vs Cola2
- Carbon-X vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Carbon-X vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Carbon-X vs Devstral Small 2
- Carbon-X vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-120b
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-20b
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Carbon-X vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Hy3
- Carbon-X vs Inkling
- Carbon-X vs Inkling-Small
- Carbon-X vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Carbon-X vs Kolibri-1
- Carbon-X vs Kronos
- Carbon-X vs Laguna M.1
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-1.7B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs Mistral Large 4
- Carbon-X vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Carbon-X vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Carbon-X vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Carbon-X vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Carbon-X vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Carbon-X vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs ZAYA1-8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kolibri-1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kronos vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LBS-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ZAYA1-8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Recursive Flint vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/carbon-x-vs-zaya1-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/carbon-x.json·/api/v1/tools/zaya1-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare carbon-x zaya1-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "carbon-x", "b": "zaya1-8b"}at/mcp, no key