Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
ZAYA1-8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 80
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 50
Watch for
Liquid lists it as deprecated, replaced by LFM3-1.7B; deprecated models stay downloadable but get no further updates
ZAYA1-8B C
Best for People who want a small, fast reasoning model for maths and code and can live without tool calling
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
Tool calling needs a parser that only Zyphra's vLLM fork has
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface LFM2.5-2.6B +15
LFM2.5-2.6B 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as Liquid's card and tool-use page say how tools go in and how calls come back, and its vLLM and SGLang pages name the lfm2 parser. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls in one Python list and agentic RL inside agent harnesses. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns nothing, since the model always thinks. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens trained.
ZAYA1-8B 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (10,700 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template and a fork say it. Trained tool calling 10, the template takes tools and renders calls, and the card recommends settings for agent use, but it doesn't say the model was trained for tool calling or for several calls in a turn, so the lower band. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch, and the card names the qwen3 reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 positions in config.json, for an architecture Zyphra trained end to end, so the config is the model's own. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Reach LFM2.5-2.6B +10
LFM2.5-2.6B 90
Memory earns the full 30, since Liquid's own 4-bit GGUF is 1.59 GB and fits 8 GB with room to spare. Runtimes earn 25, with the lfm2 architecture in released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, and in Ollama through the llama.cpp version it pins. Builds earn 15 for Liquid's own GGUF, MLX and ONNX builds at many precisions. Terms earn 10, a custom licence that is free for commercial use under $10M of annual revenue. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns nothing, as Hugging Face maps no inference provider and Liquid's docs list no hosted API for it.
ZAYA1-8B 80
Memory 30, the smallest build from Zyphra is the MXFP4-Experts repository, 5.85 GB, and 5.85 GB × 1.2 = 7.0 GB, within 16 GB. Runtimes 10, Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the zaya model and SGLang 0.5.23 has srt/models/zaya.py. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Zyphra at two precisions, FP8 and MXFP4 for the experts, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API. Zyphra's site lists a cloud product for its open models, which wasn't checked for this model. 30 + 10 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.
Documentation and upkeep LFM2.5-2.6B +7
LFM2.5-2.6B 57
The model card earns 17, with everything but a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description without a cut-off. The last change earns 20, a card commit on 3 November 2026 naming LFM3-1.7B as the new version. Responsiveness earns 5, with Liquid replies in 2 of 16 discussions. Version policy earns 5, as Liquid now lists the model as deprecated with a replacement but no date. File health earns 5, since the files agree but a report about the card waits without a reply.
ZAYA1-8B 50
Model card 5, Intended use and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 26 June 2026 (the checkpoint reshaped for Transformers), 137 days before this check, and the quantised repositories on 2 July, 131 days. Responsiveness 20, Of the 16 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 May to 14 August 2026), 10 have a reply from a Zyphra member, which is most. Version policy 5, the original checkpoint is kept as ZAYA1-8B-legacy and the card says so at the top, without a date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture after the reshape. 5 + 0 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Risk ZAYA1-8B +5
LFM2.5-2.6B 50
File safety earns 25, safetensors and GGUF only, and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance earns 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation Liquid links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, since Liquid publishes neither. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the revenue threshold, with no use policy and no change since release. The security programme earns nothing, since no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact was found.
ZAYA1-8B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the Zyphra organisation, which the card ties to zyphra.com's blog post for the model (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and www.zyphra.com has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | ZAYA1-8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 80 | LFM2.5-2.6B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | ZAYA1-8B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | LFM2.5-2.6B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 50 | LFM2.5-2.6B +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.3/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Zyphra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-07-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
ZAYA1-8B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast model for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone, which Liquid now lists as deprecated in favour of LFM3-1.7B. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB and five common runtimes run it. It always thinks, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
ZAYA1-8B
A small reasoning model trained from scratch by one lab, with a clean licence, 4-bit and FP8 builds and a team that answers questions. It's the hardest of the small models to run: its own architecture, a card that points at forks, and tool calling that needs a parser no release has. Little on limits, data or safety.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
ZAYA1-8B
- Use it for reasoning, maths and code. Don't count on tool calling outside Zyphra's vLLM fork
- Run it with Transformers 5.22.2 or SGLang 0.5.23, which have the model built in
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 in general, and temperature 0.6 for agent and code work
- Download
Zyphra/ZAYA1-8B, not the legacy repository, for the released runtimes - The quantised repositories have no licence tag. The main one is Apache 2.0
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or ZAYA1-8B?
ZAYA1-8B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or ZAYA1-8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ZAYA1-8B
- Arete-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Arete-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cola2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs ZAYA1-8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ZAYA1-8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Recursive Flint vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-zaya1-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/zaya1-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b zaya1-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "zaya1-8b"}at/mcp, no key