Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Granite 4.2 3B scores 59.8 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on small hardware that want a permissive reasoning model for tool calls and coding, with thinking they can switch off
Ahead on
- Capability, 21 against 13
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 92 against 57
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results published for 4.2, and only general safety cautions
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite 4.2 3B | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 21 | 13 | Granite 4.2 3B +8 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 95 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Granite 4.2 3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Granite 4.2 3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 92 | 57 | Granite 4.2 3B +35 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.8/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite 4.2 3B | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | IBM | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Granite 4.2 3B
A small reasoning cousin for tool calls, coding and multilingual chat that runs almost anywhere, from a 2.2 GB Ollama build to vLLM and SGLang, under plain Apache 2.0 with signed files and a dataset disclosure. Thinking turns off or shortens per request. It has no published safety results and no documented JSON mode.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Granite 4.2 3B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:3b; set options.num_ctx in the request, since Ollama's default context is short and the model takes up to 131,072 - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later, serve
ibm-granite/granite-4.2-3bwith--reasoning-parser granite_thinking_parser --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --enable-auto-tool-choice; that release has the parser built in, so the card's--reasoning-parser-plugin ./granite_thinking_parser.pyisn't needed - With SGLang 0.5.18 or later,
--reasoning-parser auto --tool-call-parser autoresolve to IBM's recommended parsers, and the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for every mode, as IBM requires
- Pass
enable_thinkingfalse for direct answers orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning, through chat_template_kwargs on an OpenAI-compatible server - Earlier turns' thinking is stripped by default (
truncate_history_thinking), so pass it false to keep reasoning in multi-turn history - For JSON, use the runtime's guided decoding, since IBM documents no JSON mode for 4.2
- Verify the files with
python -m model_signing verify sigstoreand IBM's identity, per IBM's signature guide
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite 4.2 3B or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Granite 4.2 3B scores 59.8 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Granite 4.2 3B or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-3b.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-4-2-3b lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-4-2-3b", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key