Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling 2 Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Inkling 2 Small scores 58.8 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6472 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 512 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want Thinking Machines' newest open multimodal agent model and can run a runtime's pre-release image.
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 57
Watch for
The smaller checkpoint needs about 472 GB, and Thinking Machines says 500 GB of GPU memory
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 40
Watch for
Liquid lists it as deprecated, replaced by LFM3-1.7B; deprecated models stay downloadable but get no further updates
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach LFM2.5-2.6B +50
Inkling 2 Small 40
Memory 0 of 30, the smallest build is Thinking Machines' NVFP4 checkpoint at 393.5 GB, about 472 GB with a fifth added, above the 256 GB line. Runtimes 0, no released version of the six runs it; vLLM and SGLang serve it from their own images and Transformers has it on its main branch only. Builds 15, two precisions from the publisher (NVFP4 and MXFP8). Terms 10, Apache 2.0 with a binding acceptable use policy on top, read as a custom licence. Download 10, no gate. Hosted 5, Thinking Machines' own Tinker serves it as beta serverless inference, and Together is live on Hugging Face. 0 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 40.
LFM2.5-2.6B 90
Memory earns the full 30, since Liquid's own 4-bit GGUF is 1.59 GB and fits 8 GB with room to spare. Runtimes earn 25, with the lfm2 architecture in released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, and in Ollama through the llama.cpp version it pins. Builds earn 15 for Liquid's own GGUF, MLX and ONNX builds at many precisions. Terms earn 10, a custom licence that is free for commercial use under $10M of annual revenue. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns nothing, as Hugging Face maps no inference provider and Liquid's docs list no hosted API for it.
Risk Inkling 2 Small +15
Inkling 2 Small 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code to run. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation Thinking Machines links to, with a SHA-256 on every LFS file. Safety evaluation 10, Thinking Machines' own StrongREJECT, FORTRESS, HoneyBench and DistressBench results and described outside red-teaming, but nothing an outside party published or a harness to rerun. Agent guidance 5, the card names safeguards to add but doesn't say what its refusals cover, with nothing on prompt injection. Licence risk 5, 10 off for a use policy that reaches beyond the law and that can change at any time. Security programme 5, a security.txt and a disclosure policy, with public advisories unchecked and scored as absent. 25 + 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 65.
LFM2.5-2.6B 50
File safety earns 25, safetensors and GGUF only, and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance earns 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation Liquid links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, since Liquid publishes neither. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the revenue threshold, with no use policy and no change since release. The security programme earns nothing, since no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact was found.
Agent interface Inkling 2 Small +10
Inkling 2 Small 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Thinking Machines' tml-renderers guide shows how tools are declared and how calls come back for this model, and its package ships the parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking effort is set per request from none to xhigh, and the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content. Context 10, up to 1M tokens. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
LFM2.5-2.6B 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as Liquid's card and tool-use page say how tools go in and how calls come back, and its vLLM and SGLang pages name the lfm2 parser. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls in one Python list and agentic RL inside agent harnesses. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns nothing, since the model always thinks. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens trained.
Documentation and upkeep Inkling 2 Small +10
Inkling 2 Small 67
Model card 17 of 20, everything but a dated knowledge cut-off. Training data 15, an EU training-content summary with sources, mix, an October 2026 collection cut-off and filtering. Last change 20, the files were uploaded on 12 November 2026. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no questions yet, which reads as none answered. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 10, the files agree and no broken-file report waits. 17 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 67.
LFM2.5-2.6B 57
The model card earns 17, with everything but a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description without a cut-off. The last change earns 20, a card commit on 3 November 2026 naming LFM3-1.7B as the new version. Responsiveness earns 5, with Liquid replies in 2 of 16 discussions. Version policy earns 5, as Liquid now lists the model as deprecated with a replacement but no date. File health earns 5, since the files agree but a report about the card waits without a reply.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling 2 Small | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 90 | LFM2.5-2.6B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 50 | Inkling 2 Small +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Inkling 2 Small +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 67 | 57 | Inkling 2 Small +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.8/100 | D 50.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling 2 Small | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Verdicts
Inkling 2 Small
Thinking Machines' newest open model, a 594B mixture-of-experts generalist with images in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. The NVFP4 checkpoint needs about 472 GB, and no released runtime runs it yet, so today that means vLLM's or SGLang's own images, or Tinker and Together hosted. The use policy binds on download and can change.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast model for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone, which Liquid now lists as deprecated in favour of LFM3-1.7B. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB and five common runtimes run it. It always thinks, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Inkling 2 Small
- No released runtime runs it yet. Serve the NVFP4 checkpoint from SGLang's dev-inkling-2-small image with the cookbook's recipe for your hardware, or from vLLM's vllm/vllm-openai:inkling-2-small image
- In vLLM pass
--reasoning-parser inkling --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser inkling. In SGLang the tool-call parser isinkling2and the reasoning parserinkling - Transformers' main branch loads only thinkingmachines/Inkling-2-Small-MXFP8, the 622.8 GB checkpoint, and no release has the code yet
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default), xhigh or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99 - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side. The model takes no audio, and the template raises an error for an audio part
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Without the hardware, call it on Tinker's OpenAI-compatible endpoint with a Tinker key, at $0.30 input and $1.00 output per million tokens as read on 6 November 2026
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling 2 Small or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Inkling 2 Small scores 58.8 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling 2 Small or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling 2 Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Arete-27B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Arete-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling 2 Small
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Inkling 2 Small
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cola2 vs Inkling 2 Small
- Cola2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling 2 Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling 2 Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling 2 Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling 2 Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Inkling 2 Small
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling 2 Small
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling 2 Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling 2 Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling 2 Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling 2 Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling 2 Small
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling 2 Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling 2 Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Inkling 2 Small
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Inkling 2 Small
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling 2 Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling 2 Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling 2 Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling 2 Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling 2 Small vs Kronos
- Inkling 2 Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling 2 Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling 2 Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling 2 Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling 2 Small vs LFM3-1.7B
- Inkling 2 Small vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling 2 Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling 2 Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling 2 Small vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling 2 Small vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling 2 Small vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Inkling 2 Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling 2 Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling 2 Small vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling 2 Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling 2 Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling 2 Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling 2 Small vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Inkling 2 Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling 2 Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling 2 Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling 2 Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling 2 Small vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling 2 Small vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling 2 Small vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Inkling 2 Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Inkling 2 Small
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-2-small-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-2-small.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-2-small lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-2-small", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key