Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 scores 54.6 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3588 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 50
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Best for Operators with an 8-GPU Blackwell or H200 node who want a frontier-sized open model for coding agents and defensive security, with a hosted twin on Mistral's API.
Ahead on
- Capability, 32 against 13
- Risk, 75 against 50
- Agent interface, 95 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 64 against 57
Watch for
The smallest 4-bit build needs about 732 GB, so nothing fits a single workstation or a 128 GB machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Mistral Large 4 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 13 | 32 | Mistral Large 4 +19 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 50 | LFM2.5-2.6B +45 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 75 | Mistral Large 4 +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 95 | Mistral Large 4 +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 64 | Mistral Large 4 +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.5/100 | C 54.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License (modified MIT) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Mistral Large 4
A frontier-sized open cousin for coding agents and defensive security, with strict JSON Schema output, parallel tool calls and three reasoning efforts. It needs a multi-GPU server, about 732 GB for the smallest 4-bit build, and vLLM and SGLang run it only from special images. The main risk is a licence that bars Model-as-a-Service businesses without a separate deal.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Mistral Large 4
- Serve the NVFP4 build on Blackwell with
vllm/vllm-openai:mistral-large-4 --model mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --kv-cache-dtype fp8_ds_mla --tool-call-parser mistral --reasoning-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice; released vLLM doesn't load it - On H200 use the FP8 build with tensor parallelism of 16 or 8 by 2 pipelines, per vLLM's recipe
- Pass
reasoning_effortlow, medium or high (default high); any other value makes the template raise an error, and there is no off switch - Read the reasoning from
message.reasoning;max_completion_tokenscounts reasoning tokens too - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 at every effort, per the card
- Ask for JSON with
response_formattype json_schema and strict true; the template passes the schema to the model - The template rejects a tool message straight after a user message and a conversation that doesn't start with a user or system message
- Add
--speculative-config '{"method": "dspark", "num_speculative_tokens": 3}'to use the embedded draft head - If you'll offer it to others as a hosted model, read the licence first; Model-as-a-Service use needs Mistral's commercial licence
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 scores 54.6 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Mistral Large 4
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Mistral Large 4
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Mistral Large 4
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Mistral Large 4
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Mistral Large 4
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Mistral Large 4
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large 4
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Mistral Large 4
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Mistral Large 4
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Mistral Large 4
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Mistral Large 4 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Mistral Large 4 vs occamy-1.0
- Mistral Large 4 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Recursive Flint
- Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Mistral Large 4 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-mistral-large-4.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/mistral-large-4.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b mistral-large-4(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "mistral-large-4"}at/mcp, no key