Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
LFM2.5-2.6B and InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 51.5 (D) and 51.2 (D). InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview D
Best for Agents with 64 GB to spare that want an Apache-licensed image and video reader with optional thinking and can live with a stale preview.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
No quantised build from OpenGVLab, so about 51 GB at BF16
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 60
- Agent interface, 75 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 28
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.5 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 95 | LFM2.5-2.6B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 45 | 75 | LFM2.5-2.6B +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 57 | LFM2.5-2.6B +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.2/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenGVLab (Shanghai AI Laboratory) | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0; a merge of openai/gpt-oss-20b (Apache 2.0 with OpenAI's usage policy) and OpenGVLab/InternViT-300M-448px-V2_5 (MIT) | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2025-09-08 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
An image and video reader on gpt-oss-20b with an optional thinking mode, a preview untouched for over a year. It needs about 51 GB in BF16, since OpenGVLab publishes no quantised build, and runs in Transformers and vLLM. The main risk is a chat template in the Transformers-format repository that doesn't match its tokenizer, with no safety results.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Serve with
vllm serve OpenGVLab/InternVL3_5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview-HF --max-model-len 32768, which is our command; the card gives none for vLLM - Check the rendered prompt before relying on it, since the shipped template's <|im_start|> markers aren't tokens in the gpt-oss tokenizer; the GitHub-format repository's harmony template is the alternative
- Use Transformers 4.55.0 or later, as the card requires for this size
- For thinking, send the card's thinking system prompt and parse the reasoning out of the <think> tags, with temperature 0.6 and sampling on as the card advises
- Keep inputs within 32K tokens, the length it was trained at, whatever the config says
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview or LFM2.5-2.6B?
LFM2.5-2.6B and InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 51.5 (D) and 51.2 (D). InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview leads on risk.
Other comparisons with InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kolibri-1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key