Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 55
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Best for Agents with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper node, or using a hosted endpoint, that want NVIDIA's strongest open model for long agent runs
Ahead on
- Capability, 73 against 13
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 57
Watch for
The smallest build is 352 GB and needs at least four B200-class GPUs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 13 | 73 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +60 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 55 | LFM2.5-2.6B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 70 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.5/100 | B 68.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-06-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
NVIDIA's frontier-scale agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, up to a 1M-token context and training against prompt injection through tool output. It needs at least four Blackwell GPUs for the 352 GB NVFP4 build, so most agents will use NVIDIA's API or a provider. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- It doesn't fit the 128 GB reference machine at any precision. Call NVIDIA's API (model nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b) or a provider instead
- With vLLM serve the NVFP4 build with
--trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon 4 × B200 or more - With SGLang use
--reasoning-parser nemotron_3, not the BF16 card'snemotron_v3, which SGLang doesn't register - On SGLang with tools, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue andforce_nonempty_contenttrue, as the card says, or reasoning and calls won't both parse - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falsefor short tasks ormedium_effort: trueto cut reasoning tokens - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the generation config sets
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b"}at/mcp, no key