Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against GLM-4.7-Flash's 63 (B), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. GLM-4.7-Flash leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 55
Watch for
No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January
Best for Agents with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper node, or using a hosted endpoint, that want NVIDIA's strongest open model for long agent runs
Ahead on
- Capability, 73 against 59
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 28
Watch for
The smallest build is 352 GB and needs at least four B200-class GPUs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 59 | 73 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +14 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 55 | GLM-4.7-Flash +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 70 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +37 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | B 68.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-06-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-4.7-Flash
A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
NVIDIA's frontier-scale agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, up to a 1M-token context and training against prompt injection through tool output. It needs at least four Blackwell GPUs for the 352 GB NVFP4 build, so most agents will use NVIDIA's API or a provider. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
GLM-4.7-Flash
- On our reference machine start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash - Or run
ollama run glm-4.7-flashfor the 19 GB q4_K_M build - Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks, since thinking is on by default - Set
clear_thinking: falseto keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench - Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- It doesn't fit the 128 GB reference machine at any precision. Call NVIDIA's API (model nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b) or a provider instead
- With vLLM serve the NVFP4 build with
--trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon 4 × B200 or more - With SGLang use
--reasoning-parser nemotron_3, not the BF16 card'snemotron_v3, which SGLang doesn't register - On SGLang with tools, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue andforce_nonempty_contenttrue, as the card says, or reasoning and calls won't both parse - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falsefor short tasks ormedium_effort: trueto cut reasoning tokens - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the generation config sets
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against GLM-4.7-Flash's 63 (B), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. GLM-4.7-Flash leads on reach.
Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-4-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-4-7-flash nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-4-7-flash", "b": "nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b"}at/mcp, no key