Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Darwin-36B-Opus's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Darwin-36B-Opus leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Reasoning-heavy text tasks on a 32 GB machine or a single 80 GB GPU, where a disclosed training method isn't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 55
Watch for
The merge method is proprietary and the current weights include an undescribed targeted refinement
Best for Agents with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper node, or using a hosted endpoint, that want NVIDIA's strongest open model for long agent runs
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 51
Watch for
The smallest build is 352 GB and needs at least four B200-class GPUs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Darwin-36B-Opus | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 55 | Darwin-36B-Opus +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 70 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 51 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 68.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Darwin-36B-Opus | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | FINAL-Bench (VIDRAFT) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-23 | 2026-06-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Darwin-36B-Opus
A text-only reasoning cousin merged from Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and a reasoning-distilled fine-tune of it, with about 3B active parameters. It needs 32 GB for the publisher's 4-bit GGUF or about 83 GB in BF16, and runs in vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp. The main risks are an undisclosed merge method, a card that disagrees with its files, and no safety results.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
NVIDIA's frontier-scale agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, up to a 1M-token context and training against prompt injection through tool output. It needs at least four Blackwell GPUs for the 352 GB NVFP4 build, so most agents will use NVIDIA's API or a provider. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
Darwin-36B-Opus
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf FINAL-Bench/POCKET-35B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 21 GB of files - On the reference machine BF16 fits,
vllm serve FINAL-Bench/Darwin-36B-Opus --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parsers for Qwen3.6's format - Thinking is on by default, send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - The card suggests temperature 0.6 to 0.7 and at least 5,120 new tokens for its think traces
- generation_config.json stops only on the end-of-text token, so add
<|im_end|>as a stop token if a runtime keeps generating after the turn ends - Text only, the vision encoder of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B isn't in these files
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- It doesn't fit the 128 GB reference machine at any precision. Call NVIDIA's API (model nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b) or a provider instead
- With vLLM serve the NVFP4 build with
--trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderon 4 × B200 or more - With SGLang use
--reasoning-parser nemotron_3, not the BF16 card'snemotron_v3, which SGLang doesn't register - On SGLang with tools, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue andforce_nonempty_contenttrue, as the card says, or reasoning and calls won't both parse - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falsefor short tasks ormedium_effort: trueto cut reasoning tokens - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the generation config sets
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Darwin-36B-Opus or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Darwin-36B-Opus's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Darwin-36B-Opus leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Darwin-36B-Opus or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- BigBang-v1 vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-120b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Hy3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kolibri-1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/darwin-36b-opus-vs-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/darwin-36b-opus.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare darwin-36b-opus nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "darwin-36b-opus", "b": "nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b"}at/mcp, no key