Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning's 60.7 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Which one, for what

GLM-4.7-Flash B

Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime

Ahead on

  • Capability, 59 against 34

Watch for

No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning C

Best for Agents with a 32 to 48 GB NVIDIA GPU that need one local model to read video, audio, documents and screens and call tools

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 80
  • Risk, 60 against 55
  • Agent interface, 90 against 85
  • Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 28

Watch for

Loads with trust_remote_code in every documented runtime command

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGLM-4.7-FlashNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningEdge
Capability35%355934GLM-4.7-Flash +25
Reach25%258085Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +5
Risk20%205560Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +5
Agent interface10%108590Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +5
Documentation and upkeep10%102865Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +37
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 63/100C 60.7/100

Facts side by side

FactGLM-4.7-FlashNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorZ.ai (Zhipu AI)NVIDIA
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITNVIDIA Open Model Agreement (custom, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-01-292026-08-24
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

GLM-4.7-Flash

A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

A local multimodal cousin for video with speech, long documents, charts, screens and English transcription, with tool calling, a reasoning switch and a 262,144-token context. It needs about 27 GB for NVIDIA's NVFP4 build on Blackwell, or 42 GB for FP8. The main risks are the remote code it loads and a repository where nobody answers questions.

Before you call either

GLM-4.7-Flash

  1. On our reference machine start it with vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash
  2. Or run ollama run glm-4.7-flash for the 19 GB q4_K_M build
  3. Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
  4. Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
  5. Pass chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false} for short tasks, since thinking is on by default
  6. Set clear_thinking: false to keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench
  7. Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

  1. Start it with vllm serve nvidia/Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-FP8 --max-model-len 131072 --trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --kv-cache-dtype fp8 on vLLM 0.20.0 or later, after pip install "vllm[audio]" if any audio will be sent
  2. Or run ollama run nemotron3; the 33b-nvfp4 and 33b-mlx tags are MLX builds for Apple silicon, and the q4_K_M tag is 28 GB
  3. Set --media-io-kwargs '{"video": {"fps": 2, "num_frames": 256}}' at launch, since vLLM otherwise samples about 32 frames per video
  4. Send chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false} for transcription and quick answers, and use temperature 1.0 with top_k 1 for ASR as the card recommends
  5. Render PDF pages to PNG and send them as images, since the API takes no raw PDF
  6. Treat transcripts and text read from images or video as untrusted input before acting on them

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning's 60.7 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.