Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kronos
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Kronos's 55.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Kronos leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January
Kronos C
Best for Agents that need a quick local forecast or synthetic sample of a candlestick series on modest hardware, for research or as one input among others.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 61 against 28
Watch for
Runs only through the publisher's own PyTorch code from GitHub, in no named runtime and with no quantised build
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kronos | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 55 | GLM-4.7-Flash +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | GLM-4.7-Flash +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | GLM-4.7-Flash +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 61 | Kronos +33 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | C 55.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kronos |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Yu Shi (shiyu-coder, NeoQuasar), Tsinghua University |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-04-13 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | none | 43k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
GLM-4.7-Flash
A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.
Kronos
Forecasts the next price bars from a history of up to 512 candlestick bars. Every size fits in under 0.5 GB and runs on a CPU, but only through the publisher's own Python package. Nobody has benchmarked it independently, its quickstart data was deleted from the repository, and the publisher hasn't replied since November 2025.
Before you call either
GLM-4.7-Flash
- On our reference machine start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash - Or run
ollama run glm-4.7-flashfor the 19 GB q4_K_M build - Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks, since thinking is on by default - Set
clear_thinking: falseto keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench - Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000
Kronos
- Clone https://github.com/shiyu-coder/Kronos and
pip install -r requirements.txt, then loadKronos.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-small")andKronosTokenizer.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-Tokenizer-base")and wrap them in KronosPredictor - Pair Kronos-mini with Kronos-Tokenizer-2k and Kronos-small or Kronos-base with Kronos-Tokenizer-base, the cards' pairing
- The examples read examples/data/XSHG_5min_600977.csv, which no longer exists; point them at tests/data/regression_input.csv, 2,500 five-minute bars
- Keep the lookback at or under max_context, 512 bars, and pass the future timestamps you want as y_timestamp, since the calendar fields come from them
- Raise sample_count for a steadier forecast, but expect only the mean back; call the lower-level auto_regressive_inference yourself if you need the paths
- Treat forecasts as model output to check, not signals; the README says its own backtest pipeline isn't a production trading system
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or Kronos?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Kronos's 55.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Kronos leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or Kronos
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kronos
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kronos
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kronos
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Kronos
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Carbon-X vs Kronos
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kronos
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kronos
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kronos
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kronos
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3 vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kronos
- Hy3 vs Kronos
- Inkling-Small vs Kronos
- Inkling vs Kronos
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kronos
- Kimi K3 vs Kronos
- Kolibri-1 vs Kronos
- Kronos vs Laguna M.1
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kronos vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kronos vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-kronos.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-4-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/kronos.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-4-7-flash kronos(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-4-7-flash", "b": "kronos"}at/mcp, no key