Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime
Ahead on
- Capability, 59 against 25
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 80
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 55 against 28
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 59 | 25 | GLM-4.7-Flash +34 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | GLM-4.7-Flash +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 55 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +27 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | C 56.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-4.7-Flash
A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A tiny reasoning cousin with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, running in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF on almost any machine. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files untouched and questions unanswered since March.
Before you call either
GLM-4.7-Flash
- On our reference machine start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash - Or run
ollama run glm-4.7-flashfor the 19 GB q4_K_M build - Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks, since thinking is on by default - Set
clear_thinking: falseto keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench - Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-4-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-4-7-flash nemotron-3-nano-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-4-7-flash", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-4b"}at/mcp, no key