Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B scores 56.8 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3674 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 45
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 55 against 49
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Best for Teams with Blackwell GPUs or a DGX Spark who want an Apache 2.0 coding model to try for terminal and agentic coding work, and can run the publisher's code to serve it.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
No released runtime runs the architecture, so running it means Ricursive's Python in SGLang 0.5.19 or Transformers' remote code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +45
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 90
Memory earns the full 30, since NVIDIA's own 2.84 GB GGUF needs under 4 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes earn the full 25 from released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang, Transformers, Ollama and LM Studio. Builds earn 15 for NVIDIA's FP8 and GGUF. Terms earn 10, since the Nemotron licence is custom even though it's free for commercial use with no threshold or use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 0, as no Hugging Face provider serves it and no NVIDIA hosting was found.
Ripple-65B Preview 45
Memory 10 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Ricursive's NVFP4 at 57.2 GB, 68.7 GB with a fifth added, which is over 64 GB and fits our reference machine. Runtimes 0, no released runtime runs the ricursive architecture with its own code; Ricursive's SGLang plugin and Transformers' remote code don't count. Builds 10, one quantised precision (NVFP4) from Ricursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, Ricursive serves no API, Hugging Face maps no provider, Together AI's page says coming soon, and GMI Cloud's and OpenRouter's pages weren't read.
Risk Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 65
File safety earns 15, safetensors and GGUF only but with 10 off because the documented commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository. Provenance earns 15, files in NVIDIA's linked organisation with a hash for every file. Safety evaluation earns 0, no results. Agent guidance earns 10, subcards that name prompt injection and the safeguards to add, without an instruction hierarchy. Licence risk keeps all 15, since the switch to the Nemotron licence happened on release day. The security programme earns 10 for the reporting route on the card and NVIDIA's public bulletins.
Ripple-65B Preview 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the documented way to run it loads Ricursive's Python. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation ricursive.com links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Ricursive's own FORTRESS and StrongREJECT results. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw.
Documentation and upkeep Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +6
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 55
The model card earns 20, all seven items with limitations in the linked subcard. Training data earns 20, datasets listed with sources and dates, crawled sets with token counts, a cut-off and published NVIDIA datasets, though most synthetic sizes are undisclosed. Last change earns 5, as the files last changed on 20 March 2026, and TensorRT-LLM's Nemotron-H commits since 14 October touch MoE, NVFP4 and Puzzle paths this dense model doesn't use, in release candidates or no release. Responsiveness earns 0, with no NVIDIA reply to any of six questions, re-counted on 4 November. Version policy earns 5 as a first release. File health earns 5, since the LICENSE file is empty, reports and fixes wait without a reply, and the card's Transformers snippet names a repository that isn't public.
Ripple-65B Preview 49
Model card 14 of 20, no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general description with token counts and no cut-off. Last change 20, released today. Responsiveness 0, no discussions yet, read as none answered. Version policy 5, a first release, with the NVFP4 checkpoint replaced in place on release day under a commit note. File health 5, tokenizer_config.json carries a second, tool-less chat template and a 131,072-token limit against the card's 1M.
Agent interface Ripple-65B Preview +5
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 70
The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10 of 25, as only the template shows the format and the parser name appears only in a serving command. Trained tool calling earns 20, with tool-use benchmarks and data and several calls per turn in the template. Structured output earns 0, not claimed or documented. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request with a parser that returns the reasoning apart. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens.
Ripple-65B Preview 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Ricursive's server README says how tools are declared and calls come back, with the ripple parser in SGLang 0.5.19. Trained tool calling 20, one or more calls a turn and agentic-coding RL. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the template has no thinking switch or effort levels. Context 10, long-context training at 2M-token sequences for a stated 1M.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Ripple-65B Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 45 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +45 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 55 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | Ripple-65B Preview +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 55 | 49 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.8/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Ripple-65B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Ricursive Intelligence |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-03-16 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A 3.97-billion-parameter reasoning model with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, which runs in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files unchanged and questions unanswered since March 2026.
Ripple-65B Preview
A dense 65B coding model from a new lab, pretrained from scratch and released today under Apache 2.0, that Ricursive says leads U.S. open-weight models on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Nobody has checked that yet, and the custom architecture runs only through Ricursive's own SGLang plugin on Blackwell GPUs, with a 57 GB NVFP4 build as the smallest.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Ripple-65B Preview
- Run Ricursive's launcher from inference/server with
uv run --script serve.pyon two B200 GPUs; it listens on 127.0.0.1:30000 with a 16K context by default - The launcher turns on
--reasoning-parser rippleand--tool-call-parser ripple; without them tool calls come back as raw text inside tool_call tags - For
tool_choice: "required"setstrict: trueandadditionalProperties: falseon each function, which the README says stopped extra argument fields - Leave room in
max_tokensfor reasoning as well as the answer, since thinking is always on - Use chat_template.jinja, not the template inside tokenizer_config.json, which has no tool support
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3 Nano 4B or Ripple-65B Preview?
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B scores 56.8 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3 Nano 4B or Ripple-65B Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ripple-65B Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Carbon-X vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Ripple-65B Preview
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kronos vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-nano-4b-vs-ripple-65b-preview.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json·/api/v1/tools/ripple-65b-preview.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-nano-4b ripple-65b-preview(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-nano-4b", "b": "ripple-65b-preview"}at/mcp, no key