Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 54.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3674 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
Ahead on
- Reach, 55 against 45
Watch for
SGLang's cookbook still points to a pull request or a dev image on 4 November 2026, and vLLM's recipe still names a nightly image, though both runtimes' releases carry the model code
Best for Teams with Blackwell GPUs or a DGX Spark who want an Apache 2.0 coding model to try for terminal and agentic coding work, and can run the publisher's code to serve it.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 35
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 41
Watch for
No released runtime runs the architecture, so running it means Ricursive's Python in SGLang 0.5.19 or Transformers' remote code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Ripple-65B Preview +20
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 35
File safety earns 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the SGLang route the card links passes trust_remote_code for the repository's configuration and processor code. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation MiniMax links to with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing; the launch post's security testing measured offensive capability, and the template's root role isn't documented as a trained hierarchy. Licence risk earns 5, after the military-use ban and the $20M threshold. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy or advisories.
Ripple-65B Preview 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the documented way to run it loads Ricursive's Python. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation ricursive.com links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Ricursive's own FORTRESS and StrongREJECT results. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw.
Reach MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +10
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 55
Memory earns nothing. MiniMax's only build is its 250 GB NVFP4 and MXFP8 release, about 300 GB with the fifth added, above 256 GB, and no runtime library has a local build. Runtimes earn 20. llama.cpp from b11861 runs it, Ollama v0.40.14 pins llama.cpp b11963 with the minimax-m3 architecture, vLLM v0.33.0 (tagged 1 November 2026) registers the architecture and meets its recipe's minimum version, and SGLang v0.5.23 (tagged 29 October) registers it with M3.1 processor code and tests, though its cookbook still points to a pull request. Transformers support is in progress per the card and LM Studio has no entry. Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision. Terms earn 10, since commercial use is free with attribution and a notice below $20M of yearly revenue. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns 5, since MiniMax's API and Novita serve it. 0 + 20 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 55.
Ripple-65B Preview 45
Memory 10 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Ricursive's NVFP4 at 57.2 GB, 68.7 GB with a fifth added, which is over 64 GB and fits our reference machine. Runtimes 0, no released runtime runs the ricursive architecture with its own code; Ricursive's SGLang plugin and Transformers' remote code don't count. Builds 10, one quantised precision (NVFP4) from Ricursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, Ricursive serves no API, Hugging Face maps no provider, Together AI's page says coming soon, and GMI Cloud's and OpenRouter's pages weren't read.
Documentation and upkeep Ripple-65B Preview +8
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 41
The model card earns 11, missing limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns nothing, as it isn't described. The last change earns 20, an evaluation-results commit of 30 October 2026 after the release commit of 23 October. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no MiniMax reply in nine discussions opened from 23 to 31 October. Version policy earns 5 for a first release in its own repository. File health earns 5, for the tokenizer's 40,960,000-token model_max_length against the 1M context, the Transformers library tag against the card, and an unanswered vLLM streaming report. 11 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 41.
Ripple-65B Preview 49
Model card 14 of 20, no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general description with token counts and no cut-off. Last change 20, released today. Responsiveness 0, no discussions yet, read as none answered. Version policy 5, a first release, with the NVFP4 checkpoint replaced in place on release day under a commit note. File health 5, tokenizer_config.json carries a second, tool-less chat template and a 131,072-token limit against the card's 1M.
Agent interface Ripple-65B Preview +5
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, since only the template shows the format and the parsers come from vLLM's and SGLang's own docs. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several invoke blocks in one call. Structured output earns nothing, as it isn't documented. Reasoning control earns 10, with reasoning_effort per request on the card and the reasoning in mm:think tags. Context earns 10 for 1,048,576 tokens with no position scaling.
Ripple-65B Preview 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Ricursive's server README says how tools are declared and calls come back, with the ripple parser in SGLang 0.5.19. Trained tool calling 20, one or more calls a turn and agentic-coding RL. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the template has no thinking switch or effort levels. Context 10, long-context training at 2M-token sequences for a stated 1M.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Ripple-65B Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 45 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 35 | 55 | Ripple-65B Preview +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | Ripple-65B Preview +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 49 | Ripple-65B Preview +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.3/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Ripple-65B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Ricursive Intelligence |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Ripple-65B Preview
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights. vLLM 0.33.0 and SGLang 0.5.23 carry its code. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
Ripple-65B Preview
A dense 65B coding model from a new lab, pretrained from scratch and released today under Apache 2.0, that Ricursive says leads U.S. open-weight models on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Nobody has checked that yet, and the custom architecture runs only through Ricursive's own SGLang plugin on Blackwell GPUs, with a 57 GB NVFP4 build as the smallest.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM 0.33.0 or later, or the recipe's image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash, with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
Ripple-65B Preview
- Run Ricursive's launcher from inference/server with
uv run --script serve.pyon two B200 GPUs; it listens on 127.0.0.1:30000 with a 16K context by default - The launcher turns on
--reasoning-parser rippleand--tool-call-parser ripple; without them tool calls come back as raw text inside tool_call tags - For
tool_choice: "required"setstrict: trueandadditionalProperties: falseon each function, which the README says stopped extra argument fields - Leave room in
max_tokensfor reasoning as well as the answer, since thinking is always on - Use chat_template.jinja, not the template inside tokenizer_config.json, which has no tool support
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Ripple-65B Preview?
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 54.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Ripple-65B Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ripple-65B Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs Ripple-65B Preview
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-ripple-65b-preview.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/ripple-65b-preview.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m3-1-flash ripple-65b-preview(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "b": "ripple-65b-preview"}at/mcp, no key