Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 40
- Risk, 55 against 35
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No released vLLM or SGLang ran it on 24 October 2026; only llama.cpp b11861 from that day did
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 40 | Laguna S 2.1 +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 35 | Laguna S 2.1 +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Laguna S 2.1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 41 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 50.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights, and vLLM and SGLang support was pre-release on 24 October 2026. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM's nightly image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 minimax-m3-1-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}at/mcp, no key