Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 35
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 52 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 35 | Laguna S 2.1 +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 52 | Olmo 3 7B Think +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | ||
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Olmo 3 7B Think?
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key