Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
Laguna S 2.1 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB C
Best for Agents and apps that need a fast local conversational model with tool calls on an 8 to 12 GB GPU, a Mac or a Jetson, such as voice assistants and game characters.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Risk, 80 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 4.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
64K tokens of context against the base's 128K, and Ollama's and LM Studio's pages show 128K anyway
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 90 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 80 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 65 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 4/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
A small cousin for voice and device assistants, game characters and robot interfaces, trained for multi-turn tool calls, instruction hierarchy and short spoken replies, with thinking switchable per request. NVIDIA's Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 8 GB, and Ollama and LM Studio carry it. Context is 64K, half the Gemma 4 base, and NVIDIA publishes no safety results.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-bolt:e4b, about 8 GB of files, and setnum_ctxto 65536 or less, since NVIDIA supports 64K - With NVIDIA's GGUF use
llama-server -m Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-E4B-Q4_K_M.gguf -c 65536 -ngl 999 --jinja, and add--reasoning on --reasoning-budget <tokens>to cap thinking - With vLLM 0.31.0 or later pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4and the repository's chat_template.jinja - Pass
enable_thinkingexplicitly inchat_template_kwargs, since the template defaults to off whatever the card says, and setskip_special_tokensfalse as the card's examples do - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95in both modes, as the card says - Set
conversational_modetrue for spoken replies, which appends a brevity instruction to the system prompt - Answer a slow tool at once with a pending
toolmessage, then send the result later as a user message starting TOOL RESULT, as the card's asynchronous pattern says - Keep persistent rules in the system prompt and send state updates as separate user or system messages in order, per the card's prompting guidelines
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB?
Laguna S 2.1 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM5-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs occamy-1.0
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-2B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Recursive Flint
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "nemotron-3-5-bolt-e4b-4gb"}at/mcp, no key