Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
Olmo 3 7B Think and LFM2.5-2.6B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 52.3 (D) and 51.5 (D). LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 75
- Agent interface, 75 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 52
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Capability, 28 against 13
- Risk, 75 against 50
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 13 | 28 | Olmo 3 7B Think +15 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 75 | LFM2.5-2.6B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 35 | LFM2.5-2.6B +40 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 52 | LFM2.5-2.6B +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.5/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Olmo 3 7B Think?
Olmo 3 7B Think and LFM2.5-2.6B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 52.3 (D) and 51.5 (D). LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key