Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Kolibri-1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for German and English agent work with tools on a machine with about 96 GB of accelerator memory and vLLM, where a permissive licence matters.
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 57
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest publisher build is FP8 at 78.8 GB, so it needs about 95 GB and won't fit a 64 GB machine
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 60
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kolibri-1 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 95 | LFM2.5-2.6B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 50 | Kolibri-1 +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 75 | Kolibri-1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 70 | 57 | Kolibri-1 +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kolibri-1 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Aleph Alpha | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-19 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kolibri-1
Kolibri-1 is a German and English reasoning model with a documented tool-call format, switchable thinking and a 262,144-token context, under Apache 2.0. Aleph Alpha's FP8 build needs about 95 GB and runs on vLLM through its plugin, Transformers 5.20 or recent llama.cpp. The main risk is no published safety results or security contact, and few repository answers.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Kolibri-1
- Start it with pip install 'aleph-alpha-inference>=1' then vllm serve Aleph-Alpha/Kolibri-1 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --reasoning-parser kolibri1 --tool-call-parser kolibri1 --enable-auto-tool-choice
- Without the kolibri1 tool-call parser and enable-auto-tool-choice, tool calls come back as text in tool_call tags
- The plugin supports one vLLM minor version, 0.29, so don't upgrade vLLM while it's installed
- Thinking is on by default at high effort. Pass reasoning_effort none or enable_thinking false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.97 and top_k 128
- Past 262,144 tokens, add --max-model-len 1048576 and the max_position_embeddings override in --hf-overrides, though Aleph Alpha recommends staying at or below 262,144
- With Transformers 5.20 or later, tokenizer.parse_response returns the answer in content and the reasoning in thinking
- On the reference machine the FP8 build fits by size, but no document confirms vLLM runs FP8 on gfx1151, and Aleph Alpha ships no GGUF for llama.cpp
- Validate tool results in your own code, as the card asks
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kolibri-1 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Kolibri-1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Kolibri-1 or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kolibri-1
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kolibri-1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kolibri-1
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kolibri-1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kolibri-1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kolibri-1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kolibri-1-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kolibri-1.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kolibri-1 lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kolibri-1", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key