Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 41
Watch for
Liquid lists it as deprecated, replaced by LFM3-1.7B; deprecated models stay downloadable but get no further updates
Best for Agent builders who want to train or test an agent against simulated tools, terminals, browsers and phones on a 128 GB machine
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
Not a general assistant, and the card doesn't describe using it to call tools
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach LFM2.5-2.6B +35
LFM2.5-2.6B 90
Memory earns the full 30, since Liquid's own 4-bit GGUF is 1.59 GB and fits 8 GB with room to spare. Runtimes earn 25, with the lfm2 architecture in released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, and in Ollama through the llama.cpp version it pins. Builds earn 15 for Liquid's own GGUF, MLX and ONNX builds at many precisions. Terms earn 10, a custom licence that is free for commercial use under $10M of annual revenue. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns nothing, as Hugging Face maps no inference provider and Liquid's docs list no hosted API for it.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 55
Memory 10, Alibaba's only build is the BF16 safetensors, 69.32 GB, and 69.32 GB × 1.2 = 83.2 GB, above 64 GB and inside the reference machine's GPU share. Runtimes 20, Four released runtimes run the architecture, vLLM 0.33.0 (Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration), SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 (qwen3_5_moe) and llama.cpp b12242 (its Qwen conversion code). Builds 0, Alibaba publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI licence, in the metadata and as a LICENSE file, with no use policy or other terms added. Download 10, the repository isn't gated, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026). 10 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 55.
Agent interface LFM2.5-2.6B +25
LFM2.5-2.6B 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as Liquid's card and tool-use page say how tools go in and how calls come back, and its vLLM and SGLang pages name the lfm2 parser. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls in one Python list and agentic RL inside agent harnesses. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns nothing, since the model always thinks. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens trained.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 50
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, the same as the template in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared and how calls come back. Trained tool calling 10, the template renders several tool_call blocks in one turn, but the card presents the model as a simulator of what tools and environments return, not as a tool caller. Structured output 0, no JSON or JSON Schema output documented for the model. Reasoning control 0, the card says thinking is on by default and names the qwen3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say how to turn thinking off or budget it. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native per the card and the text config. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 50.
Documentation and upkeep LFM2.5-2.6B +16
LFM2.5-2.6B 57
The model card earns 17, with everything but a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description without a cut-off. The last change earns 20, a card commit on 3 November 2026 naming LFM3-1.7B as the new version. Responsiveness earns 5, with Liquid replies in 2 of 16 discussions. Version policy earns 5, as Liquid now lists the model as deprecated with a replacement but no date. File health earns 5, since the files agree but a report about the card waits without a reply.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 41
Model card 11, the card gives intended use (simulating agent environments), architecture, parameters and context length. Training data 5, A general description without a cut-off, the three training stages and a statement that no outputs from external API services were included. Last change 10, the last commit was on 25 June 2026, an update to the card, 138 days before this check, past 90 days and within 180. Responsiveness 0, 10 discussions that aren't pull requests, opened between 24 June and 5 July 2026. Version policy 5, A first release, with nothing replaced. File health 10, Config, both copies of the template and the card agree on the architecture and the context. 11 + 5 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 41.
Risk Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B +5
LFM2.5-2.6B 50
File safety earns 25, safetensors and GGUF only, and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance earns 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation Liquid links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, since Liquid publishes neither. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the revenue threshold, with no use policy and no change since release. The security programme earns nothing, since no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact was found.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, 21 safetensors shards and no pickle or Python files, and config.json has no auto_map. Provenance 15, files sit in the Qwen organisation, the one Alibaba's Qwen repositories on GitHub link to per the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B listing (10), and the Hub gives a SHA-256 for every large file (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy, refusal statement or general cautions on the card. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no terms the licensor can change or revoke, and the card's licence link points at the LICENSE file in the repository. Security programme 0, no reporting route on the card. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 55 | LFM2.5-2.6B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 50 | LFM2.5-2.6B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 41 | LFM2.5-2.6B +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.3/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast model for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone, which Liquid now lists as deprecated in favour of LFM3-1.7B. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB and five common runtimes run it. It always thinks, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
A specialist, not a chat model. It plays the environment an agent acts in, across seven domains, so you can train or test an agent without the real thing. Alibaba ships BF16 only, which fits a 128 GB machine, and hasn't answered a discussion on it or changed the files since June.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Use it as the environment, not the agent. Give it the domain's system prompt from Alibaba's GitHub repository, the history and the agent's action, and it returns the predicted observation
- With vLLM pass
--language-model-only, or startup fails on the missing vision weights - Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, and allow up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends
- Keep at least 128K of context, since the simulation depends on the history
- Thinking is on by default and comes back through the qwen3 reasoning parser
- A simulated observation is a prediction. Check anything that matters against the real environment
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key