Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.2 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 75
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Best for Agents on a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell GPUs that want a long-context, tool-calling reasoning model with documented training data
Ahead on
- Capability, 54 against 13
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 57
Watch for
The card's serving commands pass --trust-remote-code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM2.5-2.6B | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 13 | 54 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +41 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 75 | LFM2.5-2.6B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 57 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.5/100 | B 66.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM2.5-2.6B | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-03-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
A long-context agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, a reasoning switch and a full account of its training data, under a free commercial licence. It needs about 100 GB of GPU memory, a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell hardware for NVIDIA's NVFP4. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- On the reference machine start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-super, the 87 GB q4_K_M build, the only one that fits (about 104 GB with the margin) - Raise the Strix Halo GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is far below what it needs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95for every task, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falseorlow_effort: trueinchat_template_kwargsfor short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Raise context past 262,144 only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576)
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM2.5-2.6B or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.2 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with LFM2.5-2.6B or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm2-5-2-6b nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm2-5-2-6b", "b": "nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b"}at/mcp, no key