Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.2 (B) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. DeepSeek-V3.2 leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with an eight-GPU server who want an MIT agent model with broad runtime support, or agents calling it through a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 69 against 54
Watch for
689.5 GB of FP8 files and no smaller build from DeepSeek or a runtime library, far beyond 107.4 GB
Best for Agents on a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell GPUs that want a long-context, tool-calling reasoning model with documented training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 60
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 34
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The card's serving commands pass --trust-remote-code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 69 | 54 | DeepSeek-V3.2 +15 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 75 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 34 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B +31 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.6/100 | B 66.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-12-01 | 2026-03-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 is an MIT-licensed reasoning model trained for parallel tool calls, with thinking chosen per request, for long agent work. It needs about 690 GB of FP8 files, eight 80 GB GPUs in vLLM's recipe and prompts built from DeepSeek's Python. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes since December 2025 and no safety evaluation.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
A long-context agent cousin with trained parallel tool calls, a reasoning switch and a full account of its training data, under a free commercial licence. It needs about 100 GB of GPU memory, a 128 GB unified machine or Blackwell hardware for NVIDIA's NVFP4. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code and no published safety results.
Before you call either
DeepSeek-V3.2
- Start it with vLLM's recipe, vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v32 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser deepseek_v32 --reasoning-parser deepseek_v3
- It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine at any qualifying build, so call DeepInfra (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2) or SambaNova (DeepSeek-V3.2) instead
- Outside vLLM, build prompts with encoding/encoding_dsv32.py and wrap parse_message_from_completion_text in error handling, since DeepSeek says it handles well-formed output only
- Pick thinking or chat with thinking_mode, and read the reasoning from reasoning_content
- Send developer messages only for search-agent prompts, the only use DeepSeek gives that role
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 and keep prompts within 128K tokens
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- On the reference machine start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-super, the 87 GB q4_K_M build, the only one that fits (about 104 GB with the margin) - Raise the Strix Halo GPU memory limit first with
amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is far below what it needs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95for every task, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking: falseorlow_effort: trueinchat_template_kwargsfor short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Raise context past 262,144 only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576)
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek-V3.2 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B scores 66.2 (B) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. DeepSeek-V3.2 leads on capability.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek-V3.2 or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v3-2.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v3-2 nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v3-2", "b": "nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b"}at/mcp, no key